Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Duval pissed off at Canada

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:13 AM
Original message
Robert Duval pissed off at Canada
While he was up here making a movie someone informed him that he could not use deadly force while protecting property. Apparently Canadians value human life over stereos. What's next? Gay marriage. Legal pot smoking. Them dirty rat fuck commie bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. How does one get pissed off...
...at an entire country? This doesn't even begin to remotely make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. Duval has said anti-Canadian things before....He seems to be a hard-nosed
right wing type to me, when I've seen him on Leno or Letterman...He made the ridiculous statement that American actors are better actors than Canadian actors...As if the place of birth determines their talent...Perhaps he lost a part to a Candian and it's bugging him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. Tupical of a RWer...
Maybe he hates Canada, but he'll travel up here to shoot if there's a bck to be made.

Way to stand on your principles, Santini!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kamika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. lol id be pissed off too
Edited on Sat Aug-16-03 09:32 AM by Kamika
Thats a stupid law. If someone is prepared to hurt you or steal somethin he should be prepared for what he might get in return.

Thats one of the things i never was able to figure out why the socialist countries deprive their people of basic rights to protect their homes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Idon't think they are deprived, I think they have not fallen for the
propaganda of 'Buy Arms and be afraid at all times please', 'Buy expensive security systems and be afraid at all times please', crap that our country fell for. Now we have the most paranoid, aggressive, dangerous mentality in the developed world. Canada's definitely on the right track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kamika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. what propaganda??
Thiefes and murderers are the same in every country..

Just we have the option to actually defend ourselfes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandWatie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. unless you live in Texas you don't
Edited on Sat Aug-16-03 09:57 AM by StandWatie
there is only one state in the union that allows you to use lethal force to defend property and that leads to interesting things like the ability to legally shoot the repo man on sight.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. and for every case
where a gun has actually prevented a crime there are 10 accidental shootings and hundreds of crimes committed with the use of guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caribmon Donating Member (258 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. I am sorry but...
Texas flags and typos don't make us Canadians feel any more respect to your opinion.

So before you go on a tirade of anti-Canadianism over Robert Duvall's security fears in Canada, let's look at a few things.

Generally guns are, and should be, used for killing wildlife like deer, moose and elk in a sustainable fashion to fill up the freezer for the winter. Not for trophies, nor for shooting people who are in your front yard.

At least that's what guns are for in Canada. Some DU'ers may not agree with me on that, but that is a reality for a lot of my family who live in central BC. There are no horns on the wall, its food. Simple enough... and apologies to the vegetarians.

We have 30 million people in a country larger than the US and can live very comfortably in a sustainable environment… If we can keep the multinationals from raping our resources that is.

For the rest of it, we don't have an hysterical NRA lobbyist segment in Ottawa, nor do we have an enormous weapons industry that is crucial to our economy. So why should we create fear to fuel an industry?

If Duval doesn't like it he can leave, it's simple. We aren't going to change our lifestyle and culture for an actor. We have decriminalized pot, made gay marriages legal, and spend less on our military and more on healthcare than you do... so shoot us, take us over, bitch about our 'lack of security', buff up your guns and go home to Texas or wherever if you don't like it. Simple... it's like changing the channel.

Click.

We have already taken Hollywood by storm because of our highly talented film industry (much thanks to the government funded National Film Board of Canada which has consistently given more projects to visual artists than any country on earth on a percentile level).

I say that with tongue in cheek, because what righties have been screaming about in Canada for years (the NFB) has now turned out to be one of the largest industries in Canada, our film industry, which has decisively taken huge market share from the south for many good reasons. Including talented cheap labour, less stringent legal loopholes on shoots, a broad talent pool of actors and comedians and more.

Duvall can join the Ted Nugent School of Knocks as far as I am concerned. I totally lost all respect for him at this point. And for that Texan Freeper-cum-democrat or reversed; who actually has the audacity to post shit like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
29. Uh, I'll trust the legal system.....
over vigilante justice anyday.

As for acts committed in self defence, why isn't battered women's defence as successful in the US as it is in Canada?
Options to defend ourselves, yes, I think we do have them......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. it's not socialist countries
try great briton, japan, france, germany practically every damn developed country in the world. our gun laws more closely approximate a third world country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kamika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I think they are just fine
Our gun laws are great as they are. Maybe its those countries that should develop alittle and face facts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. here's the count


"Every year, approximately 14,000 people die as a result of handgun use in the United States. In other nations with stricter handgun laws, rates are much lower. Last year, Australia had 13 handgun deaths, the United Kingdom had three, Sweden had 36, Japan had 60, Switzerland had 97, and our neighbor to the north, Canada, had 128. Rates in the United States were as much as 1,000 times higher."

you tell me who's more "developed".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kamika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. well whats the %
those countries has alot fewer people then we do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiltonLeBerle Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Try reading a little closer-
Although a link might have been appreciated, the last line says that rates in the U.S. are 1,000 times higher- I assume that that has to do with "per capita" rates, and would be about percentages, not raw numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
34. sorry i didn't link
i just googled "handgun deaths" and pasted from one of the many, it was dated in the year 2000. there are numerous sites and yes, they are talking about the "rate" per capita.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. I would say
Australia, United Kingdom, Sweden, Japan, Switzerland, and Canada's populations combined is more then the United States, if you count all the deaths by handguns, it isn't close to the ones by US. But all of these countries prevent the sales of Semi-Automatic Weapons, require owner licensing, and owner registration while in the United States only Some States require this. I do notice the poster said Japan, but I know for a fact less then 1% of all households own guns, they are well dicipline society, they rarely commit the crimes we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. You should come up and see us sometime...You might like us
Robert Duvall seems to have a hate on for Canada. He has made anti-Canadian remarks before....He said not too long ago that Americans are much better actors than Canadians...This is a ridiculous statement...Actors' abilities are not a result of whether they were born in Canada or the United States....I wonder if perhaps he's pissed because he was passed over for a role that went to a Canadian?....Who knows....From the things I've heard him say on late night talk shows, he strikes me as a rather hard-nosed right wing type anyway...He probably shares your assessment that Canada is a "socialist country", which of course it is not, really....I think we have an excellent balance in the way our country is run....We do not have people being spirited away to secret prisons, not charged with anything and not allowed to see lawyers etc.....Think about it...

P.S. This is not meant as America bashing....I live close to the U.S.A border and we have much going on back and forth across the border and are good friends...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. I've heard some virulent anti-French nonsense
from Duvall, too, so I think we all know where he's coming from.

He's still one of my favourite actors. It's when he's playing himself that I have problems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. Agreed....He is an excellent actor....PERIOD....
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. I don't think so....
he ain't so hot.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. I don't care for him personally, but I have to admit he's a good actor!
To me personally, he's about as appealing as a lizard but I really do believe he is an excellent actor...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. I can't care for somebody so lacking in nuance and sensitivity.....
he's good in his very limited way. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. "lacking in nuance and sensitivity"
Edited on Sun Aug-17-03 07:03 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
Robert Duvall is one of the great character actors of his day. He's up there with Pacino, Hoffman, Hackman, and DeNiro.

Look at his work as the consigliere in The Godfather. You are looking for subtlety. He gives it to you in spades in that roll.

Some of Robert Duvall's and Sean Connery's politics are a little right for me but they are good role models for how a man should conduct himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Yes, lacking in nuance and sensitivity....
He contradicts himself and shows himself to be such an ignorant, small-minded clod in real life....no Mr. Sensitivity....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. I Have Seen Him On TV
a couple of times and that's not the way he comes off to me.

But I guess some folks want to reject anything remotely masculine.


To me being a liberal and being masculine are not mutually exclusive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tameszu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. Pretty funny for a guy who's named "Duvall"
Edited on Sat Aug-16-03 11:08 AM by tameszu
Just like Tom DeLay, attacking Dem politicians for being "French." Duh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tameszu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #17
28. C'mon now, this is easy math
The % is pretty simple to figure out, and the U.S. isn't that much bigger. It's prety obvious that the %-tage of deaths in the U.S. is ridiculously higher. Back of the envelope calculations:

Australia: 13/20,000,000 = 0.000065%
Canada: = 128/32,000,000 = 0.0004%
Japan: 60/127,000,000 = 0.000047%
Sweden: 36/9,000,000 = 0.0004%
Switzerland: 97/7,000,000 = 0.0014%
UK: 3/60,000,000 = 0.000005%

USA: 14,000/290,000,000 = 0.0048%

That is, the %-tage of handgun deaths per capita in the U.S. ranges from 10x more (than Sweden) to 1000x more (than Australia or the UK). That's a crapload more.

BTW, in Canada, you have the right to use deadly force to defend yourself as long as it is not disproportional and you also have the right to use force to defend your property, as long as it is not more force than is necessary to conduct your defence. This doctrine is not an unreasonable one. It says: please don't kill anyone if you don't have to. I would respectfully submit that the alternative is rather barbaric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #17
32. look over here
Gun Homicides per million inhabitants:

Canada 6.0
Germany 2.1
United Kingdom 1.3
United States 62.4




http://www.handgunfree.org/HFAMain/research/abroad/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treepig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #15
38. why do you limit deaths to hand guns?
other types of guns can kill and injure too!

the total number of gun deaths is much higher, from this site

http://members.ozemail.com.au/~confiles/american.html

there are 38,317 total gun deaths in the USA in a recent year with 17,971 of them being suicides. there are better statistics available directly from the CDC (i'm too lazy to look them up right now) but they're in line with these higher numbers. in fact, in some years almost as many people are killed by guns as in traffic accidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. Well actually
we Canadians just call the cops, and they take care of it.

It's not a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magnolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
46. What I don't get....
...is why anyone would be willing to take another human life to protect their STUFF! I wonder about the person who puts their STUFF and their family in the same catagory. Sure, I would kill with my bare hands to protect my daughter...if she were in actual risk, not imaginery risk. But there is nothing I own, including my house and my entire bank account, that is worth a human life no matter how depraved that life is. In fact...I wouldn't kill a dog to protect my STUFF!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pink_poodle Donating Member (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. You can only use as much force as you receive..............
In other words, if you are hit by a stick, you cannot blast away with a gun. It sucks. It means that anyone entering your home can do so and you cannot hit them unless they hit first and only then can you give back what they give you. If they use a baseball bat, then so you can you but you can't hit with a machete or shoot with a gun. See what I mean? It is just way too screwed up here. I for one would not want some creep coming through my house and not having an option to stop him in any way I can. It's just not fair. He has no right to be here in the first place and therefore I should have the option of being able to fight back to defend myself and property.

As far as Duvall goes, he can piss off as he lives in America so therefore it is none of his business. What the hell does a Mr. Big like him care about us up here for anyway. sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. You can only use deadly force
when your life is threatened. If someone was in your house in the dark ,shoot the bugger. But if he was on your land or stealing your car and you or someone else was not in danger,you cannot shoot him. A couple of years ago a Japanese student was trick or treating on Hallowe'en. The property owner told him to freeze. He didn't and the guy shot him. No charges. There was no threat,the guy was on the lawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. You can't use deadly force to protect property in this country either
You can use it to protect yourself or the life of another.

Been the law for decades here.

Duval is a fricking cowboy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Duval is an excellent actor IMHO
I especially liked him in the recent movie "Gods and Generals"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. I loved him in Apocalypse Now
but actors should not be expressing their opinion right now cause we're in a war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Actors who live here in America are allowed to
There is a first amendment. Just because someone choose entertainment as a profression doesn't mean there rights should be stripped away. If they can't express their opinions, then nearly can Bill O'reilly or whoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. That was just a lame joke
I was just making a comment on how the Dixie Chicks and Garofalo (is that the right spelling) were dragged around for their views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. Yep
I learned that in my Firearms training course, first thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carrowsboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
26. no wonder...
..he was so believable as Stalin in that HBO movie a few years back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
37. I Hope He Doesn't Think
you can use deadly force in America to protect property.

You are entitled to use as much force as necessary to repel an attack, not more...

And if a guy's running down the street with your tv you're prolly going to prison id you shoot him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. One thought...
I'm basically sitting on the fence on this one, but I think the fact that a Canadian home is less likely to have a deadly weapon such as a handgun withing the owner's reach means that a Canadian burgler is less likely to feel the need to arm himself to level the playing field. Particularly as you can likely avoid serious jail time in Canada for property crimes (non assault/murder etc), but if you use a gun (or even a replica or toy gun) in a crime and get caught, they throw the book at you, and you go inside for a couple of years. It's not worth the risk, especially if you know that whoever lives in the house won't have anything to shoot at you with.

Signed,
Devil's Advocate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
42. F* Duval! I'm avoiding everything he makes along with the other wingnuts
(Arnuld, Gibson, Eastwood, Stallone Raygun, Gibson and the guy from the Love Boat). There isn't an accomplishment so breathtaking to excuse bigotted and hateful attitudes - I can't even see his face now without thinking of his ugly soulles insides.
Been avoiding Hollywood trash anyway for years, so this will be easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. I am with you robbedvoter! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. You're Throwing In Good Actors With Bad Actors
and conflating conservatism with bigotry.

I won't go to see a movie by a racist or a bigot but I am not going to boycott someone just because he or she is a garden variety conservative.

I'd have to see the context of Duvall's remarks about the use of deadly forece to protect private property. I wouldn't shoot someone who was running down the street with my tv but I wouldn't think twice about putting a bullet in the head of someone who was trying to burn down my home.

Boycotting someone because their views differ from yours is about the most illiberal thing I could think that someone could do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC