OK, the film divides America, not Bush, and not the war, but those who reports the facts???http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3838243.stmMichael Moore's award-winning documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 has opened to rave reviews - but not among supporters of President George Bush.
The filmmaker has made it clear that he wants this film to send Mr Bush crashing to defeat in November's presidential election.
And Republicans have few kind words for Mr Moore.
But while praise has been lavished on him following top honours at Cannes, reviewers are beginning to take a more critical look at the film.
Praise for Moore
...
It is worth seeing, debating and thinking about, regardless of your political allegiances
A.O. Scott, New York Times
"The documentary's scathing attack on the war in Iraq and George W Bush's presidency is informative, provocative, frightening, compelling, funny, manipulative and, most of all, entertaining," she said.
In the New York Times, A.O. Scott said, "
can be obnoxious, tendentious and maddeningly self-contradictory. He can drive even his most ardent admirers crazy. He is a credit to the republic."
...
'Propaganda
But many media reports also focused on the conservative backlash against Mr Moore and the film.
Books critical of Mr Moore are set for release, and conservative group Move America Forward has led a high-profile campaign to encourage theatres not to screen the film.
Another conservative group, Citizens United, has called on the Federal Elections Commission to investigate whether television ads for the film violate new campaign finance laws, media reports noted.
Mr Moore says the film does not endorse Democratic candidate John Kerry, in fact, it criticises him and other senior Democrats for not standing up to President Bush.
And the campaign finance law makes an exemption for media, which the film might fall under.
But Citizens United counters that the film is propaganda and should not qualify for the media exemption.