MSNBC Poll: Is "Fahrenheit 9/11" an honest portrayal of President Bush?

[arcos]

From what you've read, seen or heard is "Fahrenheit 9/11" an honest portrayal of President Bush? * 24697 responses


Yes
63%

No
37%

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3096434/

You know what to do ;)

[cjbuchanan]

1. Voted Yes

But I find it amazing that 25000 people have already seen the movie AND decided to vote in this poll. I mean no one would vote without seeing the movie, would they?
:shrug:

[jeff30997]

3. Of course not!

:evilgrin:

[flamingpie2500]

6. Anyone who knows Michael Moore knows he is honest. I can say that

without seeing the movie.

[aquart]

13. Yes, of course. That Nader thing was a fluke. All is forgiven.

And it was honest support, after all. Honesty is what counts. Yes, indeedy.

[flamingpie2500]

19. what nader thing?

[acmavm]

7. All the publicity, all the clips, all the anguished squeels from repubs,

this is not chrystal ball material.

[arcos]

8. well, the question says "From what you've read, seen or heard..."

:P

[LostInAnomie]

9. dupe

[AbbeyRoad]

10. Seen, Read, or Heard

The question isn't limited to people who have already seen the movie but to people who have "seen, read, or heard" about it.

[LostInAnomie]

11. Good point

Why would they start this poll when it would be impossible for the majority of the people who take it to have actually seen the movie?

[oasis]

2. 24,896 responses. Still 63% yes 37% no. Why do so many hate America?

[acmavm]

4. Done.

.

[LostInAnomie]

5. Done

You know what I don't understand. Every poll like this on MSGOP the democratic side always dominates, but the continue to be the sluttiest of whores for the Repigs. Shouldn't they as well as CNN get the hint that their viewers are mainly democrats.

[Kenneth ken]

21. because they don't care

about left or right. They are a corporation, they care about wealth and power. The cons are more thoroughly focused on increasing wealth and power for the already wealthy, while a portion of the Dems have some residual concern for the wealfare of those who are not wealthy.

The haves and have mores do their best to ignore us as much as possible, except for when the election cycles come round, and then "our" team pay lip service to supporting out hopes and dreams - gotta keep the charade going some how.

Once they have either
A) kicked us in the teeth so much we give up the fight
or
B) put the corporate stranglehold on tight enough as to be unbreakable,

then they can give up the illusion of the US as a democratic republis.

Give 'em a few more years, they're getting really close.

[He loved Big Brother]

12. I think if you haven't seen it, you shouldn't vote

Just my opinion.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

15. I have seen it

and it sure is an honest portrayal of Bush. The movie shows him at his moranish best.

[candy331]

20. I heard a lady behind me say "this would be funny if it was not for

real." What a sad state for a fallen land that does not know it has fallen. If half of what was brought out is the truth it is a sad state of affairs but the worst part is not even half was brought out.

[arcos]

17. again, the question says "From what you've read, seen or heard..." n/t

[KoKo]

14. From what you've read, seen or heard? Are they trying to say they've

reported FAIRLY on Moore's book? I wouldn't bother freeping this poll. If the numbers are bad it will make them look worse for distorting the info to their viewers. If we "unfreep" it, it will make them pat themselves on the back for being "fair and unbiased." imho

[arcos]

16. we have VERY good numbers... 63%-37% n/t

[gratuitous]

18. Obviously it's not an honest portrayal

Moore went far too easy on him.

{Ducks to avoid the inevitable brickbats from people looking for an excuse for a Friday Afternoon Flamefest}

[teamster633]

22. Holding steady at 63%

...and yes, it would be hard to truly do * justice.

[Rebellious Republican]

23. Voted, Yes 63% No 37% N/T