I am having my first taste of Faux news.. O'Reilly using Hitchens's poison

[LittleApple81]

piece to attack Michael Moore, and saying the President Bush should sue him for libel....
Hitchens's... who believes Hitchens?

[LittleApple81]

1. By the way, could Mike Moore SUE O'Reilly instead? n/t

[Union Thug]

2. i say Bush should sue him then..

.. How much you wanna bet that he won't? Proving libel is hard to do when it's all TRUE...

Go for it, tough guy!

[tishaLA]

3. It was incredible

He kept saying--falsely--that Moore had said America is a bad place and then ends the interview by asking whether Moore is unpatriotic! Wow. I think Splotchy is going to have a LONG nose tomorrow from that.

[LittleApple81]

4. I had NEVER watched O'Reilly before... I don't think I will watch him

ever again.
That was easy.

[MikeG]

5. O'Reilly should read Hitchens' book calling Mother Teresa a drug dealer.

Since they're almost fuck buddies now.

[Hoping4Change]

8. Don't you mean fuck n suck buddies?

[Djinn]

9. Did he call her a drug dealer?

I'm no fan of Hitchens drivel supporting teh Iraq war - personally I think he called it wrong and his ego wont let him back out - but have no problem with a lot of his other stuff - Kissinger being a war criminal for example.

I was also no fan of Theresa and her views that suffering people didn't need painkillers, her hospices didn't need hygiene or modern equipment(despite her order being loaded) or her association with brutal dictators, however I'm unaware that he referred to her as a drug dealer?

[MikeG]

12. The book was called "The Missionary Position"

[Djinn]

14. I'm know the book

I'm just not sure of your assertion that he calls her a drug dealer in it - it's been a while since I read it - and there were parts I didn't read too fully as it just rehashed stuff that was already known - could you give me a bit more info on what his justification for calling her a drug dealer was or what his general contention there was? Thx

[MikeG]

17. I'm going by memory. It could have been in an article.

I distinctly remember the "drug dealer" epithet though.

[Djinn]

18. are you sure it wasn't an article about rather than by Hitchens

I'm harping on this point I know - but I think if we're going to criticise Hitchen's comments re F 9/11 and Mike Moore because he invents argunments that Moore never made then we should avoid doing the same thing about Hitchens

[librechik]

6. O'Reilly, what does it say if Bush doesn't sue?

Does it say he concedes the point? After all, if Michael is lying it is SLANDER! The president must protect himself and his sacred office from slander, doesn't he? Why don't you spend more time this week trying to get Bush to sue Michael? Because I think that would certainly be the right thing to do, if Michael is lying, right?


<I can't wait. PLEEEEEEASE sue Michael, Shrub! PLEEEEEEAse!>

[Fenris]

7. Answer: Hitchens believes Hitchens

[Hoping4Change]

10. Well this cements Hitchens descent to the gutter. Praise from

oily wet rotten slimeball is creepy. I hope Hitchens liks his new found friends.:puke:

[frylock]

11. o'reilly left f911 after 30 minutes..

fuck.. I mean Cheney that piece of shit.

[GiovanniC]

13. I Wonder What Pushed Him Over the Edge

The Saudi/Bush connection was being discussed about 30 minutes in, if memory serves.

[BlackVelvetElvis]

15. I'm with the previous poster

Let Bush sue.
"No Spin Zone" my ass!

[Junkdrawer]

16. Now Bush, listen to this O'Reilly guy - he knows what he's talking...

about when it comes to suing people. Just ask Al Franken.