There's a Mexican proverb: Mexicans are like crabs in a pail; as soon as ONE of them tries to crawl up the side of the pail, the rest are clinging/hanging on and DRAGGING him/her DOWN.
O.K., so I submit that EACH sub-group of the Dem umbrella has SOMEBODY to be ashamed of: 1) Blacks, Clarence THOMAS, 2) Gays, any Gay-Closeted-Repuke. 3) Hispanics, Miguel ESTRADA. And we could go ON.
Here we have an Affirmative Action/ NPR/ WashPostColumnist "Latino" doing what he ALWAYS does (take the Repuke side). His name is "Ruben NAVARRETTE, Jr" (isn't that FRENCH?) Anyway, he decides to use his national voice to say he dislikes his fellow Hispanic.
**********QUOTE*********
http://www.postwritersgroup.com/archives/nava0812.htm As a Mexican-American native of California, I never thought I'd be reacting with such ambivalence to the possibility that the state might elect its first Latino governor in modern times.
Of course, nor did I ever imagine that I'd be coming to the defense of Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Wrong on both counts. While I can't seem to get too worked up over the idea of a Gov. Cruz Bustamante, neither can I get the smile off my face at the mere thought of a Gov. Schwarzenegger. ....
*****UNQUOTE****
1) First the KELLER Doctrine, that there might be a superior candidate (GORE), but the twit (Shrub) is not boring. Just substitute the Dem names in CA for GORE and Ahhhnuld for Shrub.
2) Note the twisted rhetorical device: He says BUSTAMANTE “dutifully insists” opposition to the recall, but has “declared his candidacy” and is out to “persuade” voters to see him as an alternative to *DAVIS*. No, NAVARRETTE, he’s an alternative to the other candidates IF there is a recall.
3) He’s not “excited” about “Cruz” on the grounds of having known him for 10 years and not being impressed with his leadership. He then lists BUSTAMANTE’s resume, who worked himself up from aide to legislator to speaker to LT Gov----but this is not seen to be an accomplishment, unlike, say, stripping nude and bombasting words written by others. Instead, BUSTAMANTE’s experience is interpreted to be just partisan hack stuff and aimed always at “political calculation”-----why would somebody engaged in professional politics be doing that?
4) Like Tweety MATTHEWS, this maverick NAVARRETTE, while pretending to “independence” actually always comes down on the side, not of the underdogs, but of the most powerful, the most “instant recognition”, and the most “substantial resources” alternative available.
5) NAVARRETTE criticizes the DEMOCRATIC PARTY and the “national media” for the “rude reception” they gave him for UNFAIRLY “pummeling” on the grounds of Ahhhnuld’s “being reluctant to answer questions.” NAVARRETTE says Ahhnuld should NOT have to give us a clue about his ideology, which just might give his enemies “ammunition.” Oh. But somebody help me, anybody, why should the Democratic Party be welcoming Ahhnuld or anybody advocating the recall?--please 'splain.
6) And finally, NAVARRETTE returns to the criteria in place since 2000 for choosing candidates: Do not, he says, go by such trivialities as qualifications, experience, policy positions. No. What we should go by is EXCITEMENT and “his story”.
*********UNQUOTE*********