Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Russ Feingold for AG: Who would you like to see in a Dem cabinet?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 12:05 PM
Original message
Russ Feingold for AG: Who would you like to see in a Dem cabinet?
Feingold or Elliot Spitzer? If Spitzer, do you see another spot for Feingold?

If Wesley Clark decides against running, would you want to see him head the Pentagon? Or State?

What about Dianne Feinstein as Secretary of Defense?

Would you put Rubin back in at the Treasury, or is there someone else better or comparable for that job?

What about Warren Rudman or Gary Hart at "Homeland Security"?

Who would you put in charge of the CIA or FBI?

I'm throwing out plausible choices, which I'm sure some will criticize as too conservative. I don't see Dennis Kucinich as Secretary of Defense, I'm sorry. But I'm really interested in what every one else thinks about the best cabinet, whether plausible or not, to undo the Bushist damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Clark for National Security Adviser
Richard Holbrooke for secretary of State.

I'll have to think about the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Spitzer as AG...
and Feingold as chairman of a major Senate committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Feingold can't be chairman
That is still probably about 10 years away. He might become chairman of judiciary eventually. I would rather keep Feingold in the senate so that he could gain that seniority and influence. Spitzer might be good but he should run for Governor of NY in 2006. I think that Thurbert Baker of Georgia might also be a good Attorney General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. No keep Feingold in the Senate
Cuomo would make a fine Atty General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. I like Feingold a lot,
but lets not forget that it was his vote that made it possible for Ashcroft to be attorney general. Feingold provided the winning vote to get Ashcroft's nomination out of committee, because he wanted to make a conciliatory gesture toward the Republicans in hopes of ending the political nastiness.

I would be hesitant to put Feingold in a position of power until I see some evidence that he has learned that you can't follow the Queensbury Rules when fighting brownshirts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's the Ashcroft vote that makes me think he's AG material
The Repubs will have a difficult time fighting Feingold if he's nominated. They'd have an easier time if he'd resisted. The upshot is, the US would have a certified progressive where a certified loonie now rules the roost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bobby Kennedy, Jr., maybe at Interior ...
Edited on Mon Aug-18-03 12:44 PM by cosmicdot
Jim Hightower ... maybe at Agriculture

Paul Krugman perhaps at Treasury?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Please keep Feingold in Wisconsin
I think he would make a great AG: he has the education, the skill, the intelligence. But I think he can do his best work in the Senate or in the White House.

Replacing Russ in Wisconsin would be difficult. Unlike many other states where the replacement is appointed by the sitting governor, Wisconsin requries a special election. It would essentially be a run-off like we are seeing in California right now and I lack confidence that the best candidate can win in such a circumstance.

Of course, I'm highly biased!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That's understandable
What's up with WI, anyway? What happened to the classic WI progressives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheesehead Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. We're trying...
For 12 years the Repugnant Tommy Thompson dominated our politics from the Governor's chair. We have a fine tradition in the Senate - Gaylord Nelson, Bill Proxmire, Russ Feingold but are having as much harder time getting progressives into the House and the state govt. Outside of Milwaukee and Madison, the state is pretty conservative and Repugs seem to have the edge. We are working to change that.

http://www.fightingbobfest.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. More like 14 years of Tommy the man who sold the world
Thompson.
Let's keep Russ Feingold unless he would take a position in our elected Dem. presidency in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Wisconsin conservative isn't the same as, say, Utah conservative, is it?
I mean we're talking about a state full of Swedes and Norwegians. Granted, they're the descendants of ones who opted not to stay in what would become socialist paradises, but my impression (from a brief stint there myself) of Wisconsin conservative is that it is really and truly conservative: resistant to change--or movement--of any kind--unless it gets you near ducks or walleyes. I don't think of it the way I think of the belly-aching, tax-hating, mouth-frothing sort of wingerism you see in New Hampshire, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. That sounds about right.
For the most part they aren't Bible-thumpers either. Even Repugs have to run as environmentalists here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. Beggin yer pardon there,
but Mad & Milw aren't the only liberal areas in WI. Remember Superior & the whole Scandinavian co-op tradition. McGovern carried Superior in '72, ya know. Hell, Gore even carried Eau Claire Co. (but lost Chippewa, an old-time Dem county next door to the north) in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheesehead Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Sorry, forgot about Superior and my old buddy Frank Boyle!
Living here in Appleton is killin' the few brain cells I have left.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not a cabinet nominee
But Al Gore for Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I was wondering where to put Gore
That's an excellent suggestion!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sexybomber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Keep Spitzer in NY
If he runs for Governor in 2006, he's got my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'd love to see Eric Schneiderman, my state senator
as NY gov, or US Senator. He's a progressive's progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. Dean as Secretary of Health and Human Services
That's a good start.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snyttri Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. Feingold is too independent and stubborn to be AG
He would not hesitate to begin independent investigations that might hurt the party if his principles required him to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Where do you get that idea?
Feingold's not an investigator nut like Dan Burton or other wacko Repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. If Arlen Specter wins and the Senate can be changed through one vote
appoint him AG. The Dems will have control of the Senate and someone who's practically a liberal will be AG anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. That's an interesting idea
Except that I can't stand Arlen Specter. I hope he loses and disappears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. We need people like Feingold in the Senate
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
23. I think Clark will head the Office of the Vice President.
Dean/Clark administration:
State: Graham
Defense: Kerry
Attorney General: Kucinich
Agriculture: Sen. Tom Harkin, IA
Labor: Ron Gettelfinger (UAW head)
HHS: Edwards
HUD: Sharpton
Transportation: Sen. John McCain, R-AZ
Energy: Sen. Jim Jeffords, I-VT
Education: Braun
Veterans Affairs: Fmr. Sen. Max Cleland, D-GA

CIA: Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-ME
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avatar13 Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Here's my wish list
Energy: Bill Bradley or Jeff Bingaman
AG: Eliot Spitzer, John Conyers, Henry Waxman, Russ Feingold
Labor: Almost any D, Arlen Specter**, George Voinovich**
Commerce: Jeanne Shaheen, Susan Collins**, Harold Ford
HUD: Carol Mosely-Braun*, Maxine Waters
Trans: John Breaux, Peter DeFazio, Norm Mineta
Interior: Ralph Nader, Maria Cantwell, Jennifer Dunn**
Education: James Jeffords (To spite Bush), Jack Reed
State: Al Gore, Richard Lugar**, George Mitchell, Robert Menendez
VA: Max Cleland (To further spite Bush), Zell Miller, Tom Udall
Homeland: Evan Bayh, Charles Rangel
Defence: Wesley Clark*, John Kerry*, Bob Kerrey
Treasury: Lawrence Summers, Jon Corzine, John Doerr (From Kleiner Perkins)
HHS: Barbara Lee, Olympia Snowe**, Howard Dean*
Agri: Dick Gephardt*, Tom Vilsack, Tom Harkin

Fed: Alan Greenspan
EPA: Gary Locke, or maybe even Christie Whitman** (with nowhere the restraint imposed upon her by the Bush admin)
CIA: Bob Graham*, Jay Rockefeller, Porter Goss**
NSA: Zbigniew Brzezinski, John McCain**, Kiron Skinner(?)
UN Amb: Bill Clinton

OMB: John Podesta
Drug Czar: Peter King**
Solic Gen: David Boies or Alan Dershowitz
Press: Al Sharpton, baby!

* - Potential Presidential Candidate
** - Republican

An AG that will go after corporate fraud and the Enrons of the world (like Spitzer and Waxman)would be great addition to a solid economic team, and to have sensible R's in a few key posts (like Collins at Commerce, or Lugar at State) would give Dems a chance to show what real bipartisan cooperation looks like. But posts like Defence, AG, Interior, and Treasury should not be open to anyone who doesn't oppose PNAC, Patriot, Kyoto, and RecklessTaxCutsForTheWealthy, respectively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Appointing Republican Senators also decreases their majority
if they're dumb enough to accept the position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avatar13 Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Yeah, maybe a majority can be won this way in both houses
Edited on Mon Aug-18-03 10:23 PM by Avatar13
I know it won't happen, but I can dream, can't I? So here are some more republican appointments to a Dem cabinet:

Director of White House Beverages: Denny Hastert (R-Puppet)
Deputy Director of White House Beverages: Tom DeLay (R-Puppetmaster)
Undersecretary of State for Fruitcakes: Bill Thomas (R-Arrogance)
Gay-Bashing Apologist General: Rick Santorum (R-Roy Cohn)
Nepotism Czar: Lisa Murkowski (R-Daughter)
National Crybaby Advisor: Darrell Issa (R-Grand Theft Auto)
Ambassador to Hell: James Inhofe (R-Pissquik)

On Edit: Added a new position
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
24. Haven't thought much about the others but Clark would make a fine
Secretary of Defense. Imagine, actually having a military man in that cabinet post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. Dean for Health/Human Services
Edited on Mon Aug-18-03 07:29 PM by Pepperbelly
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. If Clark doesn't run
Sec of Defense and call me crazy but Big Dog for Sec. of State, I like Gore for AG, and would like to see Rubin back at Treasury and Bill Richardson back at Enery. Guliani at Homeland Security and definetly a place for Cleland. Unfortunately I think we need to keep our Congressional Reps and Senators in their seats. I would like to see a Clark/Dean or Dean/Clark ticket first and foremost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
27. Suggestions for lesser known posts
Earl Blumenauer (Oregon Congressman) for Secretary of Transportation. He'd do what we need to do for both the environment and increasing energy independence: emphasizing non-automobile means of transportation

Janeane Garofalo or Alfre Woodard for press secretary, We all know about Janeane, but I once saw a show in which Alfre Woodard had Dennis Miller practically pinned to the floor.

John Kerry for Secretary of Defense (unless he gets the nomination). A combat veteran should run the Pentagon.

On a similar note, give Max Cleland his old job of Director of Veterans' Affairs

John Leonard (critic on CBS Sunday Morning and for The Nation) should be head of the National Endowment for the Humanities

If Lorin Maazel (whose lifetime accomplishments and activities on behalf of the environment suggest that he is NOT a Republican) was willing, I'd put him in charge of the National Endowment for the Arts.

And I want to be the Cultural Affairs Attache at the U.S. Embassy in Tokyo :-)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiltonLeBerle Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
30. Dick Durbin deserves a job-
How about Secretary of Labor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
31. Jerry Brown as Attorney General.
He knows the laws. He would make the Department of Justice...the Department of Justice.

I had wanted Clinton to choose Jerry back in 1992, but he chose Reno.

Jerry has indicated he will run for AG of California in the next election cycle. He will win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JasonBerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Thought on Jerry Brown
I agree!

He has done a helluva job in Oakland with little help. If Jerry runs for AG in California - he'll win in a walk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrueBlueDem Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
36. More diversity?
Clinton chose a cabinet that "looks like America." With diversity being a consideration and staying clear of Congress members because we don't have a one to spare, here are my picks for some of the cabinet posts:

Atty General -- Elizabeth Birch (pres., Human Rights Campaign) or Morris Dees (head of Souther Poverty Law Center)

Sec. Of Treasury -- Robert Rubin (again)

Sec. Of Education-- Marva Collins (Founder, Westside Preparatory School, Chicago)

Sec. Of Agriculture -- Gary Grant (pres. Of Black Farmers & Agriculturists)

Sec. of Labor -- Milton Rosado (Pres., Labor Council for Latin American Advancement)

Sec. Of HHS -- Marion Wright Edelman (head of children's defense fund)

Sec. Of Commerce -- Ralph Nader (How innovative is that?)

Sec. of Interior -- Jerry Pardilla (head of National Tribal Environmental Council)

Dir. Of Vet Affairs -- Max Cleland (again) or Col. Margarethe Cammermeyer

Sec. Of State -- George Mitchell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC