What Would You Do(WWYD)??

[MiltonLeBerle]

Throughout the years, the political parties have changed their stripes to some extent, back and forth, both within and between themselves...with that in mind-

Suppose that Joe Lieberman and the DLC brain-mistrust succeed in leading the Democratic Party to the fiscal/social conservative promisedland of business-friendly environment-

While at the same time, by some odd twist of the cosmos- something that starts with Arnold Schwartzeneger, Warren Buffet, Rob Lowe, Oprah, and whoever out in California ends up snowballing into a national movement that takes the Repukelican Party into a socially liberal, progressively-conservative fiscal/Environmentally-friendly direction?

Would you still call yourself a Democrat if the parties flipped on their respective axes(or do you say axii?)?

I'd stay with my ideals over "party affiliation"


edited to add: eco-friendly and my answer.

[Clete]

1. I know what I am,

a tree-hugging socialist, so I will belong to the party that is closest to my ideals.

[MiltonLeBerle]

5. I had forgotten to mention-

environmentally friendly.
edited to add same.

[donco6]

2. No.

I'd stick with my ideals, not with party name.

[searchingforlight]

3. After Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Bush and Bush

No matter what happened it would take me a long time to trust a Republican again.

[pansypoo53219]

4. ESPECIALLY

after Bush was foisted upon us.

[MiltonLeBerle]

6. I'm talking about a total sea-change-

that washes the neo-cons from the party(the ones that put the "puke" in repuke), and at the same time severs the ties with the military-industrial complex.
Ethical Business- something that's been pretty much always been a contradiction in terms.

[maggrwaggr]

7. and what would I do if monkeys flew out of my ass?

Have you seen the post from Will Pitt saying something's seriously wrong with DU?

Well this thread is a perfect example of it.

[MiltonLeBerle]

8. Why don't you see it as a completely legitimate question?

There's no ulterior motive here- I'm simply asking a question that's not a totally impossible albeit extremely unlikely scenario.
why do you wee it as some kind of threat, or something that's "seriously wrong with DU?"

[Name removed]

9. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[MiltonLeBerle]

10. Historically speaking, why is it a silly stupid question?

which party was most responsible for passage of civil rights legislation?
Could you have voted for Teddy Roosevelt? Abraham Lincoln.

why are you so closed/narrow-minded and downright hostile about discussing possibilities?