THE TRUTH ABOUT INTELLIGENCE IN IRAQ: "BRING IT ON"
by PATRICK G. COY
Time magazine reports that in March 2002, President George W. Bush met with a group of senators at the White House. He seemed little interested in debating what to do about Iraq. Instead, he said simply, "F--- Saddam, we're taking him out."
Those six, stark words, uttered long before he tried to discredit inspections and promote war, are but one reason why we need a congressional investigation into "Weaponsgate." But on July 16, the GOP-controlled Senate blocked a proposal (51-45) for an independent bi-partisan commission to investigate Iraq-related intelligence and Bush policy decisions. The Republicans appear to be running scared, and for good cause. Here are just a few of the other reasons why America needs such a commission.
Bush officials claimed repeatedly that al-Qaeda was an active ally of Iraq, but no links have ever been demonstrated. Not even close. Bush officials also trotted out the white man's burden: that the U.S. was obligated to liberate the oppressed Iraqis. Vice President Dick Cheney assured America that Iraqis would welcome us as liberators. Thus, when senators asked Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz shortly before the war whether he agreed with an Army chief of staff estimate that it would take about 200,000 troops to occupy Iraq, his reply was glibly deceitful: "Wildly off the mark."
But with 150,000 troops in Iraq months after a declared "victory," chaos reigns. The U.S. is so desperate for troops from other countries to help fight the guerrilla war we were assured wouldn't materialize that controversial weapons sales are now being used to bribe India to send troops. The U.S. will pay $240 million for 9,000 Polish soldiers. Costs in Iraq are now double what Pentagon officials testified they would be only a few short months ago. Iraqis, Americans and Brits continue to die daily.
(
more)