|
The debate about "being fit to lead" would immediately put the moron Bush at a disadvantage, considering the military record of each of them. People would be exposed to this "big-time". Combined with Kerry's run, this discussion would be front and center. If Clark wins, Kerry would be a good #2. Even if Kerry beats Clark, the point would have already been made that both exceed the moron in capability. Clark would be a good #2.
Clark's "I told you so", re: failures in Iraq and worldwide hatred would work with Dean's point about this issue. If Dean beats Clark, again the point has been made and the moron is on the short end on this issue.
Am I making sense? Just thinking out loud here. I'm looking at our chances overall, not just backing one candidate yet.
Note: I lean to Dean, and like these three candidates a lot. They would make a great primary.
|