Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

if Judge Moore doesn't recognize a Federal court's jurisidction over him…

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:36 PM
Original message
if Judge Moore doesn't recognize a Federal court's jurisidction over him…
why should any defendant that appears in his court recognize Moore's jurisdiction over them?

couldn't they just argue that the state is encroaching upon their God-given rights?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. He would say
that he's a state judge enforcing state law, not some "God-given rights."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. He is in contempt of court
He needs to be arrested, fined, and impeached. If he will not obey and uphold the rule of law, that is grounds for impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. amen,he should be fired immmediately,but
personally I think it is a big effort to start a movement that Bush can use and the democrats will have to be against. Onward toward a theocracy!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. How can he be a judge?
He does not follow Constitutional Law let alone common sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. He was elected
He doesn't have to be competent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC