Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O'Reilly didn't mention the lawsuit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LouKYDem Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 08:06 PM
Original message
O'Reilly didn't mention the lawsuit
Edited on Fri Aug-22-03 08:11 PM by LouKYDem
I rarely watch Fox News, but I HAD to watch O'Reilly tonight to see if he would've mentioned Franken's victory...

Of course, the coward didn't mention it... at all! But you know that if Fox News would've won, he probably would've had that in his Talking Points... oh well, that's fair and balanced for you. It doesn't surprise me one bit that he failed to mention this. But anyway, the other networks still seem to be talking about it. Has Fox News mentioned it at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Will we ever see
an ounce of magnanimity out of that festering sore?

Doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. It looked like a rerun. . .
. . .I know he had been on vacation this week. None of the stuff on the show was too timely.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LouKYDem Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It may have been a rerun, but...
he DID mention that he had been gone all week, and as far as I know, he hasn't had any other vacations since Arnold decided he was going to run for governor (and that wasn't all that long ago).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Would've had it in his talking points (if faux had won)
Hell, we'd be hearing about it for weeks (if we watched the moron regularly).

You're so right, he, like the sad imposters he promotes (the bush regime), is cowardly to the extreme. What a bunch of wimps.

The good news - they are less relevent today than they were yesterday, and will be even more irrelevent tomorrow. Like a big hate-filled, lie-filled balloon - punctured - and loosing mass, worth, and significance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. O'Really is a bully who is a coward...
of course he would not mention the ruling on his show, just like he would never criticize his bush*.

Has anyone heard if Al Franken has made a statement about the ruling??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chatterboy Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Al's response
He thanked his lawyers, and then thanked Fox's lawyers for filing "one of the stupidest briefs" in legal history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Gee. Didn't the judge say his suit was "wholey without merit"
what's he gonna do now....frivolous appeal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Al should counter suit LOL
as a settlement, make Fox recall OReally!! LOL Wouldn't that be rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stewert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. O'Reilly is on Vacation !

But I will bet you he never mentions it next week either, and the people who say he would
have if they had won, are dead right.

O'Reilly only does follow up stories when he was right, or when he wins.

He is the king of spin, king of bias, king of hypocrisy, and a coward.

The funniest part is all it did was put the book at #1 on the amazon.com bestseller list.

I read the entire 18 page legal brief, it was the stupidest legal paper I had ever read. It
was more like a commercial for Fox, O'Reilly, and his books, than it was a lawsuit. The
first 10 pages should not have even been in the brief, the whole thing was a joke.

And the ironic part is O'Reilly complains all the time about frivolous lawsuits, this was one of
the most frivolous lawsuits I have ever seen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LouKYDem Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Whoops!
Edited on Fri Aug-22-03 08:48 PM by LouKYDem
I just did a little research and it WAS a rerun. So much for the "latest" news! (Well we know O'Reilly isn't news anyway, but seriously, I've heard a conservative tell me one time about what they saw on "O'Reilly's News."... I wouldn't even call a liberal commentator news, it's just opinion, even if the liberal cause is right.)

But this does say one good thing (well one good thing that makes me feel better at least), it proves that I don't watch O'Reilly regularly, otherwise I would've known that it was a rerun!

I still don't think he'll say much, though, if anything, about their loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Course not
Fox will probably act like it never happened. ("Let us never speak of it again!"). Meanwhile MSNBC, CNN and NBC could hardly contain their glee as they reported the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC