Have all democratic candidates beating George W. BUsh EXCEPT for Howard Dean:
Bush would lose to a generic Democratic candidate by 43 percent to 31 percent, according to the poll.
He fared better against some specific candidates, losing 38 percent to 33 percent to Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts but beating former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean by 35 percent to 34 percent.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/08/20/elec04.prez.bush.hispanics.reut/I was looking through these campaign pictures from Dean for President meetings, and there isn't a black, asian, or latino in them. It reminds me of all the Tsongas campaign stops from 1992. Paul Tsongas, along with Jerry Brown, was Clinton's main competition for the Democratic nomination. He was extremely popular on college campuses because he had the ability to speak to over-educated people. He was uncharismatic (in general), could not raise money, and was from the northeast.
One of the reasons that Clinton won the nomination in 1992 was his support from black people. They are an enormous part of the nominating constituency in the Democratic primary. This is especially the case in my state of Michigan, because of the 1 million black people in Detroit.
It also suggests that Dean will not be able to energize black people even if he wins the nomination, and would be crushed in a match-up with George Bush in 2004. I don't know what black voter participation was in 1992, but it seems reasonable that voter turnout made a difference in that three way race between Bush Sr., Perot, and Clinton. In my opinion, black people love Clinton perhaps more than any president since JFK.
http://www.lemondust.net/archives/000350.htmlI have done crowd analysis of Deans speeches before his own campaign groups and also found a SEVER lack of anything but young caucasians.
Every poll that breaks doen those polled by race, age and sex has Deans support among minorities floundering WAY behind that of all other democratic candidates.
Even Dean himself at the RAinbow Coalition/ PUSH debates outright states that the vast majority of his support comes from white college age students, and is having problems reaching minorities.
The column was mostly positive. The only concern was Barta's observation regarding the lack of minorities at the event:
The Dallas crowd was young, white and Internet-savvy. And they were organizing. Tables were set up for petition signing, fund raising and learning how to go to precinct conventions. It was strictly grass roots, not professional. Many learned about the candidate on his Web site.
<...>
While gay support was evident at the rally, noticeably absent were Hispanics and black Democrats, the most reliable base of the Texas party.
Dean has some support among minorities, but he has a lot of work to do. However, he has made some inroads among minority leaders in Texas. The chair of the Texas Coalition of Black Democrats spoke at the rally to support Dean. Howard Dean has also been endorsed by State Rep. Eddie Rodriguez (D-Austin).
http://www.burntorangereport.com/archives/000194.htmlCA Pol Junkie
my own personal demographics aside, Meetups of Dean supporters are skewed white, college educated, and professional. Of course, the Internet is skewed white, college educated and professional and political junkies are probably skewed similarly. The $64,000 question is whether Dean's appeal is narrow but coincides with who is currently aware of him, or whether his appeal is broad, but minorities and non-college educated people are just proportionately unaware of him.
http://lunaville.blogspot.com/2003_05_11_lunaville_archive.htmlCA Pol Junkie and frankly0,
A 'random sampling of Americans' would show that few care about the election at this point. Dean's support is instructive, though. A lot of Dean supporters are normal nice people who like what he's saying. They like the toughness. That said, his tough aggressive stance turns off women in large numbers, and minorities aren't responding to this guy. Those are both VERY bad signs, as those groups are key Democratic constituencies, and tend to vote with much more foresight than the rest of us. Remember the 'there's no difference between the parties voter'? Yes, because that person is at a Dean meetup. Remember the 90% of blacks who voted for Gore on extremely high turnout because they knew that there was a difference between the parties? Well, they aren't turning out for Dean.
http://www.theleftcoaster.com/mt/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=482“Arizona and New Mexico are very important states in Governor Dean’s effort to take back America,” said Kathy Lash, former Vermont Governor Howard Dean’s campaign deputy press secretary. “They will be the first big test after Iowa and New Hampshire and Governor Dean plans to campaign very rigorously in these states. No candidate can win either of these two primaries/caucuses without significant support in the Hispanic community. In fact, New Mexico has the highest percentage of Hispanics in the electorate (42%) than any other state.” In addition, she noted, “How a candidate does on February 3 with Hispanics and African Americans will have an impact on his/her ability to appeal to states with other large ethnic populations like California, Texas and New York which all hold their elections exactly one month later on March 2.”
http://www.hispanic.bz/hispanic_tuesday_the_hispanic_vote_and_the_2004_primaries.htmBottom line is that all polls that attempt to find a candidates attractivess to minorities, show Dean trailing.
His ideas about the death senttence and gun control are siametrically opposed to the poistion of most black voters. Most black democrats supported the miliary action in Iraq.
In South Carolina, where Democrats are considered more socially conservative than the party at large, experts say Lieberman has a chance to make his case to a receptive audience. He has visited the state five times this year, including a stop in Charleston today
http://www.charleston.net/stories/071603/sta_16lieberman.shtmlDeans young white voters beleive that Deans message has universal appeal. It appatently does not.