"You're no Jack Kennedy"
SeanOhio
(274 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 02:25 PM
Original message |
|
What was the effect of Bentsen's line in 1988? I was only four, so I don't remember anything from that particular debate. In C-SPAN re-broadcasts, Bentsen clearly knocked Quayle off-guard. But what effect did it have in the post-debate spin?
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 02:26 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It was a sensation but not enough to win the election |
Nicholas D Wolfwood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 02:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Because VP debates don't matter. Still, it can't hurt that Edwards will kick some major ass tonight.
|
charlie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 02:30 PM
Response to Original message |
3. It had a lot of people wondering |
|
Why isn't this guy at the top of the ticket, instead of flaccid, ineffectual Dukakis?
|
Buck Rabbit
(999 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 02:32 PM
Response to Original message |
4. It proved a smashing victory in the VP debate means squat. |
|
Well, maybe not squat. It did stop the annoying twerp from ever again comparing himself to JFK, so that was useful.
|
Ravenseye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 02:40 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I want a Haig in 88 T shirt... |
|
..how funny would that be!?!
|
genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message |
6. It was the most memorable line in any of the debates. |
cally
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 02:50 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I think this debate may mean more than |
|
usual for VP debates. If Edwards dominates it will keep the momemtum going. Still, that line by Bentsen had little effect. It got played much but had little impact on the outcome. What I recently found out is that Bentsen was not a friend of Kennedy's. The line was used for political impact. And yes, Dems are actually politically savvy enough to spin news cycles.
|
SeanOhio
(274 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Interesting analysis. I always thought it was a high-drama moment.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:14 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.