Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could someone summarize the Gavin Newsome SF gay marriage thing for me?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
i like pizza Donating Member (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 10:23 PM
Original message
Could someone summarize the Gavin Newsome SF gay marriage thing for me?

I am doing a project for school that has to show Local, State, and National governments at work. How did Schwarzenegger respond to it? I know that Bush responded by trying to amend the constitution and what not.
thank you


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'll try
Newsom decided to allow same sex marriages because it's basically a local decision. Many marriages took place and it was glorious. The Gropinator said it was unlawful under state rules and opposed the local marriages. We'll see what the courts decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i like pizza Donating Member (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. so...
so arnold didnt declare them void or whatever? he just took a stand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Arnie didn't have the power to nullify the marriages
It depends on the courts. Arnie made a political statement and he was against gay/lesbian rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sr_pacifica Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They are void
The court decided that. California has a law voted in a few years ago that states marriage is between a man and a woman only. Newsome's argument was that that law is unconstitutional. The court decided the marriages void because California law was the law of the land, so to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC