|
I want to express something that has been reluctant for me to admit. Since the fiasco of 2000 and the subsequent years I have come to a conclusion that I hate more than anything. When I hear platitudes on here about the latest that Bush has done and that he has "damaged" the country, or that the character of the country has changed since his assuming the throne. Even sentiments about like "This is not my country, I want it back!" I am saddened, for, if we are honest with ourselves, we would realize, that since the founding of this nation, that its character hasn't changed, just glossed over or hidden from its own people.
This nation was founded, in part, because the founding fathers wanted to expand it, and the British Government wanted to honor the treaties it had signed with some of the native tribes in the west. I am not saying that the colonies did not have a legit beef with the royal government, however they did not want a democracy either. If the founding fathers wanted a democracy, why did they leave voting rights up to the states? A republic yes, democracy no. Many of them believed that a true democracy would lead to anarchy. I wanted to point this out because the American Revolution is not a cut and dried issue, but complex. One of those issues were settlers out west in Indian territory. Then after the revolution was the farce of a philosophy called "Manifest Destiny", to reach the pacific ocean by any means neccessary, even genocide and invasion of another country. But even then the American appetite for conquest did not end, we acquired an island chain by this point, and forced open a port for trade with the Japanese at gunpoint. Then came a real turning point, that trumped up excuse for a war called the Spanish-American War, by questionable means "Remember the Maine!" we fought and won a war with Spain, and now we are a World Empire, from the Phillipines to Cuba, we were now a true overseas Empire. But, even though we had a taste for conquest we did not want to get our hands too dirty. So the U.S. learned that it was easier to set up puppet states than to control directly. Don't forget Monroe's Doctrine either, it basically gives the U.S. a free pass in interfering with the internal affairs of all Latin America countries without worrying too much about what the Europeans say.
For a while we decided to leave some nations in the hands of "Friendly" regimes, usually dictatorships (Cuba), while keeping others under our thumb (Phillipines), but generally the populace was satisfied and wished to be left alone, then a bump came along, called the Great War, and then it passed, and we continued to leave most nations alone, then the Crash of '29, and the realization, by the government at least, that the world is now interconnected economically. So, with the breakout of WW2 in Europe, North Africa, and the Pacific, we were concerned, with both our rubber and oil sources threatened, the government wanted action, but the people did not. Then the Japanese made a strategic mistake, and Hitler an even greater one. Though Roosevelt wanted a war to stop Hitler (he was almost ousted in an attempted coup by pro-fascist forces by this time) the people and especially the rich only wanted to fight the "Japs". The rich in this country were particulary fond of Musolini (sp?) and Hitler, with thier handling of labor unions, and its not like there was any great love for Jews either. So we fought both and won, but now we realized that being isolated geography by any country that is a threat was not enough, for now another nation, the USSR also had a global reach. If not militarily yet, then Ideologically. With a vested interest in Europe, the USSR presented an evergoing concern. So, with the detonation of an atomic bomb by this adversary, formerly ally, the U.S. in a great show of stupidity, created the C.I.A. an organization designed to covertly fight this threat. Now it would not be so bad if this agency actualy abided by its charter, but no, in the interest of national security, and with no oversight by Congress, it had free rein. Packed full of "Gehlen's Men" a bunch of "former" Nazis from Germany who had agents throughout Russia, and included such notorious people as "The Butcher of Lyons" that fucking asshole Klaus Barbie, and of course the head, Reinhard Gehlen, Hitler's master Spy. Working with American Fascists these men subverted, and through ideological protegenies countinue to subvert, democracies worldwide. From Iran to Greece, Italy, Chile, Iraq etc. they destroyed democracy to kill communism and of course, to help American Business. Only accountable to the President, the CIA uses every trick in the book to subvert elections damn near anywhere. Two days before elections, the CIA backed a coup in Greece, and when the Greek Ambassador objects, President Johnson said "Fuck your parliament and your constitution." that was in 1967. Probably the biggest acclomplishment of the CIA and the American Government is how, most citizens have no clue that this happened.
Now to the End of the Cold War, in probably the second biggest blunder that the CIA is ever guilty of, it failed to predict the fall of the very adversary that they were created to watch. It didn't help that before they even began that the agency's first spies, the Nazis were almost all double agents. Hell I left out most of the stuff people do know about, CIA smuggling drugs, and spying on American Citizens, but its not like anything has changed. I will say this, by 1987 according to The Association for Responsible Dissent more than 6 million people have died due to Direct or Indirect actions by our government, and that is only in the last 50 years or so. Not even taking into account all the other years before that. I don't know what I am more disgusted of, the fact that now at least, the U.S. Government still operates the way it always has, or that they lie, not only to the victims but to its own citizens about its motivations. So to say that the country has somehow changed course with Bush at the helm, no it has not, it is right on track, and we will all suffer for it.
|