Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What if Hillary decided to be Dean's/Kerry's/Clark's or ?'s Vice President

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:20 AM
Original message
What if Hillary decided to be Dean's/Kerry's/Clark's or ?'s Vice President
Would that be played up as her lying? She has been quite adamant about not running for President but nary a mention about Vice-president. Would that be the thing that wins over fence sitters or would it turn people off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. As a New Yorker and as such
one of her constituents, I would be very angry and her breaking her word to serve her full term. My entire family worked on her campaign and I can tell you, they would all be pissed off. NYers can put up with a lot but DON'T LIE TO US!!! If she wants to return to the White House, she's going to have to wait or I can be reasonably sure she wont even carry New York.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. All of sudden, everyone's talking about Hillary
running for higher office in 2004, even though there is not one fact to support the idea. It's sort of like the way other topics, like gay marriage, abortion, etc seem to pop up around election-time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Its rumors that is put out primarily by the repugs.
Edited on Fri Aug-29-03 10:49 AM by liberalnurse
They continue to attack us by instigating party confusion, anger and evoking division amongst ourselves.

Speculation, rummors, gossip... all unfounded chatter but then you think " maybe could be true." Now were off track...it works. Here we are awfulizing or sizing up the possibility. They are manipulating us.

We need to take a deep breath, think and wait for facts. keep on task with our goal, to evict the resident and support our Presidential candidate. Do not take the bait.

Don't give the control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumptheshadow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Interesting, I hadn't thought of that
But it makes sense that the Republicans would want to replace the Dean headlines on Drudge with a banner about Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. Not a good idea
Even showing up on the ticket as VP would be spun as a lie. It would undermine her credibility which she needs for a future run.

By not running, and publicly announcing that she is keeping her word to the people of New York, she can contrast her integrity with that of the Bush administration and be very helpful to the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. I would hope Dean/Kerry/Clark would be smarter than that
Why bring on yourself all the Clinton bashing and baggage that would go with naming her as your VP choice?

I like her, but for now we need to be smart and get the WH back.

I'm starting to think we have a monarchy here in the US - only Bushes and Clintons can serve in the WH.

With the millions of citizens we have and the hundreds of pols can't we have a fresh face?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Kind of like I'm tired of all the attention Michael Jordon Gets
Can't we get someone to replace him? When you are the best you get the attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. You fell right into it
Is there any evidence that Dean/Kerry/Clark, or even Hillary herself, is considering Hillary for VP? Any evidence at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
25. Was there anywhere in my post that suggested this was fact or even rumor?
It was simply a question I threw out for discussion, or is it your wish to inhibit discussion? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. The "censorship" ploy
Yeah, I know! You were just asking an innocent question and I'm out to censor you.

I guess you're the one who gets to decide what we can discuss. The next time *I* want to discuss how innocent questions (which coincidentally gets asked repeatedly all at once while at the same time being discussed by the media) plays into Rove's hand, I'll ask for your permission first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. So you do wish to inhibit discussion?
Why doesn't that surprise me. If it isn't what you like put the kabosh on it. DLC tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. Was there anywhere in my post that said this was fact or even rumor?
I simply threw this out for discussion or is it your wish to inhibit discussion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hillary doesn't want to be VP
. Top of ticket is all she will accept. She can beat any Democratic canidate right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maudlin Donating Member (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. That's ONE president they'd never try to impeach.
If it meant the VP would take his place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TioDiego Donating Member (409 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Hillary is a bad choice.
Edited on Fri Aug-29-03 10:40 AM by TioDiego
No woman can be elected at this time. Too many men, would not accept it. Plus, Hillary has too much baggage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. Glad I didn't have a mouthful of coffee
ROFL - you're right on that one - Dem insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. Glad I didn't have a mouthful of coffee
ROFL - Be a great insurance policy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quahog Donating Member (704 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. Specious question
She can't "decide," she has to be asked to be the running-mate by whoever wins the nomination. And she's not going to be asked. Each of our front-runners has a perceived weakness as a candidate, one which will have to be filled in by an extraordinarily prudent choice for VP. Hillary doesn't fill in the gaps for any of these guys. The only reason to choose her would be for the sensationalism, and it's pretty obvious that the negative backlash would far outweigh whatever media traction was gained by monopolizing the headlines for a week.

Hillary's great, I can see her running for pres in '12 (PLEASE stop saying '08, Hillary fans... our guy is going to win in '04 and serve two full terms!). I think by then there will be enough distance and perspective on Monicagate and Whitewatergate and enough of the evidence will be out regarding the GOP's campaign to annihilate the Clinton family that she could probably win.

But not this year, it ain't gonna happen.

By the way, has anyone known to be sane by conventional standards suggested that she might get tapped for VP? I certainly haven't heard this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SavageWombat Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. Not gonna happen
I think the resurgence of Hillary speculation is the media attempting to spin attention away from (a) Dean's successful campaign and (b) Dubya's disastrous Residency.

Remember how much they gushed about Cuomo, eons ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. This whole thing started in a Richard Reeves column
and there was an MSNBC correspondent saying something about it on Drudge last night. I just can't see how she could or would run now, even if Bush is increasingly vulnerable. Maybe some people in her camp want her to (perhaps her husband even) but I don't think she will. I like her but now is not the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. It's RNC disinfo
anfd it's intended to disrupt us. At the very least, it distracts us from defeating Bush*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. What if people stopped posting pointless speculation like this?
I guess the DU boards would ground to a halt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. No, pointless speculation
is what grinds DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jagguy Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
18. its the smart play for her
but I doubt that she has any interest playing 2nd fiddle any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
19. You can bet the Republicans would think twice before
impeaching the President, if Hillary were Vice President. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
20. So is this the Meme de jour?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Yes
along with religious displays and "What's so bad about Ahnold?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terryg11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
23. sure, then we can get a review of whitewater and lewinsky
in the media. she's not going to enter in any capacity this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
29. It won't happen.
Why is that? Because George Pataki will appoint a Republican to replace her if she wins. Basta. Want a senator for VP? Find one (1) in a state with a Democratic governor and (2) isn't running for re-election in '04. Otherwise, look elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC