Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Greg Palast answers a question

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:08 AM
Original message
Greg Palast answers a question

Greg Palast answers the question, "Was the Iraq War a Bush Cartel Effort to Divert Attention from Saudi Arabia, the Home and Chief Financier of bin Laden?"

http://www.buzzflash.com/interviews/03/08/29_palast.html

-snip-

That’s just one of the connections. Now it gets a little bit deeper. It turns out that in 1999 and 2000, Bill Clinton sent two delegations to Saudi Arabia -- this I just reported on BBC -- quietly saying: Here’s a list of royal family members and others around the royals who are giving money to al-Qaeda fronts and people who are trying to kill us. Clinton said, "Knock it off."

Clinton basically got, you know, a fake Lewinsky from the Saudis, but no satisfaction. The Saudi’s response was to hire Vernon Jordan to keep Clinton at bay.

Bush W. comes in -- and the demands on the Saudis come to a dead halt. Further, Bush W. disbands the intelligence unit tracking the Saudi money connection to al-Qaeda. And third, and ugliest, is that Bush –- in particular, his ambassador Barbie Bodine -– pulled the visas of the FBI al-Qaeda investigation team in Yemen, so they’d have to go home. I mean, our own embassy pulled the visas of our own FBI investigators, headed by agent John O’Neill, who was in charge of al-Qaeda prosecutions for the Justice Department.

-snip-

Maybe the Saudis had the idea that they would like George Bush and James Baker, Frank Carlucci and the rest of that crew to suddenly have a few million showered upon them. The average partner of Carlyle has $25 million in equity. And the amount they put up, in most cases, is about zero. So it’s the ultimate money for nothing.
-snip-
------------------------------

read on............learn the ugly poop on the bloody hands bushgang
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JohnOneillsMemory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Palast nails it down, as usual. Bush family ties to Saudi/bin Ladens.
I wish a network news-magazine show would do the 'Bush Aids Nazis and Bush Aids Terrorists for Riches' story because that parallel is easy for sheeple to digest. They just might get it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. after listening to the callers on c-span this a.m. I

wonder if we have a chance at all. many of the callers were so uninformed/misinformed, I didn't know whether to scream or cry (so I went outside and swept up tree leavings :) )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I was thinking the same
thing while I was watching Washington Journal. I said to myself, either you're getting smarter or these people are just dumb. Especially the woman who said that Whistle Ass was a nice good man. And then in response to a woman who said she didn't know what to tell her child about respecting the pResident, a caller said something like how would she like to send her child to an oral sex group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terryg11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. thought ONeill was told to go home during Clinton year
could be wrong but thought that happened when Clinton was still in office
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. That explains a lot of things
I always thought Clinton was trying to make peaceful deals in the middle east and thereby continuing fair trade. It's now very clear that this White House thinks trade should benefit only a small minority of America and to hell with everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC