|
I saw some of Gephardt's walking around. I didn't see his speech, but I assume it was the same as the ones I've heard so it doesn't matter.
I think he shows fire and passion, but it's a matter of style how he tries to get it across. I'm actually glad he doesn't try to sound like Sharpton, because that style would impair his message.
Gephardt has to play up his strength, which is that he understands the complexities of the legislative process. But that approach I think is what causes him to appear dull, because he can't state things as flatly as the other candidates.
An example might be his discussion with the environmental activist who was asking about his renewable energy plan. The man wanted him to give him a specific figure on something, but Gephardt kept saying "I don't know" because he knew that whatever the figure turned out to be would be decided in the negotiations with all of the parties involved. He said it with kind of a "shrugging" tone suggesting that giving a figure was pointless so why give it. He might have actually ssid that to the guy.
It's similar, I think, with the health care plan, where his plan involves granting funds to corporations. Edwards picked up on that and tried to make it sound like it was some kind of giveaway, but the reality is that Gephardt felt that was necessary to make it work.
His style appeals to me, I don't know why, it might be a personality thing. I think you were the one, KoKo, who made a post about not liking Meet the Press, which I disagreed with, though I don't think I responded. I actually prefer hearing the candidates in that setting, where they're forced to back up their rhetoric. And I don't care so much for rally-type speeches.
So a working theory might be that Gephardt supporters are the people that like Meet the Press. I call that the Meet the Press theory of Gephardt support. :shrug:
|