In previous postings, we discussed the unreported attrition rate of soldiers in the Middle East (specifically in Iraq) to possibly average 3 to 5 per day due to injuries.
But according to these articles, it appears as though the average attrition rate due to injuries is closer to 10 per day, or even far greater.
"Indeed, the number of troops wounded in action in Iraq is now more than twice that of the Persian Gulf War in 1991. The total increased more than 35 percent in August -- with an average of almost 10 troops a day injured last month."
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0902-01.htmAnd according to this account, it could be exponentially greater.
"The numbers of soldiers wounded in action are hard to come by. Since the start of Operation Iraqi Freedom, the Pentagon has put the figure at 827. But Lieutenant-Colonel Allen DeLane, the man in charge of airlifting the wounded into Andrews Air Force Base, recently mentioned much higher numbers in an interview with National Public Radio.
"Since the war has started, I can't give you an exact number because that's classified information, but I can say to you over 4,000 have stayed here at Andrews," he said. "And that number doubles when you count the people that come here to Andrews, and then we send them to other places like Walter Reed and Bethesda...""
http://tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/8736/view/printSo I ask the same question again. How can the military maintain this attrition rate?
Considering the number of wounded, the number of personnel closely associated with the wounded, and the family members of those personnel and of the wounded, this could be the administrations “Achilles heel.”