Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judy & Wolf --------------We Ain't TAKING It Anymore

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:24 PM
Original message
Judy & Wolf --------------We Ain't TAKING It Anymore
Today I saw Judy WOODRUFF do the same number she did on GORE during Campaign 2000----she acted like a Church Lady while doing AMBUSH, trading on being "nice".

President GORE was too NICE. He TOOK it. He also looked/acted like the WIND was KNOCKED OUT of him when somebody was RUDE to him.

Today, Judy tried to do the same thing to KERRY.

Now, Judy and Wolf have supposedly been "Liberals".

But I submit they are SCARED Liberals.

Now, we have been KIND to Judy because of that story about Shrub, drunk, INSULTING her husband Al HUNT in a restaurant, calling him an ASSHOLE in front of Judy and Judy & Al's children.

But she's clueless. Or else she's got a vicious Rasputin PRODUCER.

Anyway, today, 9-3-03, Senator KERRY didn't TAKE it from her. He said, "Come on, Judy, you're a PROFESSIONAL. You KNOW what it's about."

Judy WOODRUFF/HUNT. Sister Soljah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now if only one of the candidates would say to Russert:
"maybe if you were this hard on Bush in 2000, instead of coddling him, we wouldn't be in this mess, you whore!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Thank You, I Love You n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheesehead Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Judy tried the same tactics on Clark
When he announced his Democratic alliance today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. woodruff...
...was pressing him about his Iraq waffling when he said that, and he was trying to wiggle out by intimidating her. I say she was doing her job in this instance. And I didn't like his tone when he was trying to talk her down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Whoa, Grass, We're Usually Vibing the Same, But What the Hey n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. upupupup - He ALSO Said
"You know BETTER that that!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starpass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. They have to start manhandling these clowns
Can't you just PREDICT every time they turn to interview a Dem---the whole demeanor, the sneer, the condesending tone. It's like being around a boorish rude asshole and finally saying "stop it, you boorish, rude asshole". I noticed that Dem talking heads are starting to tell the scream-over-them-bastards to "shut the hell up".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. The BEST are Barney FRANK and Charlie RANGEL
Years ago I saw FRANK blast Tweety, saying, "You ASKED me a question. Do you want me to ANSWER or do you want me to give YOUR (eff-ing) answer????!!!!!!" That shut Tweety up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I Love It - "Stop It You Boorish, Rude Asshole"!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Transcript
JUDY WOODRUFF, CNN ANCHOR: The John Kerry campaign plans to begin running ads here in the state of New Hampshire tomorrow. As based on his swing through this state, similar spots are airing in Iowa and pictures from his appearance there yesterday.

Well, I caught up with John Kerry in New Hampshire today and I started by asking him how much trouble he is in because of the surge of Howard Dean.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

WOODRUFF: How much trouble are you in?

SEN. JOHN KERRY (D-MA), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: We're not in trouble, Judy. And I sort of almost object to the sense of that. It's -- you know, 66 percent of the people in America don't even know who's running for president yet. I'm not relaunching my campaign, I'm announcing my campaign. This is the first major announcement we've done.

We're starting, we're doing very well. I have an extraordinary group of people on the ground in Iowa, an extraordinary group New Hampshire. There are many things happen behind the scenes.

I've not advertised. We've done no television. Howard Dean and others have. We're just getting going. An you wait and see. I think we're going do exactly what we need to do.

WOODRUFF: We've talked this week to a number of voters here in New Hampshire, some undecided Democrats. A number of them said they wish you hadn't voted the way you did on Iraq. And one of them in fact said, Well, I think he's just another politician and he thinks it's his turn.

What do you say right now to the voters of New Hampshire who are thinking these kinds of things?

KERRY: I say to the voters of New Hampshire it's critical to choose somebody to be president who is ready to be president, who has the experience, the leadership, proven leadership skills and the ability to take this nation through a very difficult period in our history.

It is not the time for on-the-job training in foreign policy and national security issues. It's the time for real leadership.

I voted correctly on the issue of going to the United Nations and threatening force -- legitimate, real, credible threat of force -- in order to hold Saddam Hussein accountable and make our country safer.

Regrettably, this president did not use that properly. And that's the difference in a president. Our president needed to go to the United Nations and threaten force because, Judy, Hans Blix and his inspectors would never have gotten into Iraq without a legitimate threat of force. WOODRUFF: You said in your speech yesterday it was wrong to rush to war without building an international coalition. But the resolution you voted for gave the president the authority to go to war without having to have an international coalition.

(CROSSTALK)

KERRY: You know us better than that. You're a professional. You know how this works.

The president and Colin Powell said to us, They're going to build the coalition. Colin Powell came to our committee and said that war would be the last resort and the only reasons were weapons of mass destruction. Now there's more than just the vote. I think the vote was the right thing to do.

Bill Clinton, incidentally, went into Kosovo without any authorization from Congress. The president didn't need our authorization. What we were doing was creating a one-voice message to the United Nations, the world and Saddam Hussein. It was the right message to send and I stand by it.

WOODRUFF: But the resolution you voted for didn't require the international coalition...

KERRY: No, Judy, but the president ought to be held to his word. No, no, no, no. I said it then. I was very clear.

WOODRUFF: But you still voted with the president.

KERRY: You bet I did, because it was the right thing to do to give the president the threat of force in order to force Saddam Hussein to inspect the inspectors. We've just been through four years with no inspectors.

WOODRUFF: You said a few days ago that Howard Dean had zero experience in international affairs. I put that comment to him when I interviewed him a couple days ago and he pointed out that he's been to 50 countries, at least, outside the United States. He has more foreign policy experience than Ronald Reagan did when he was elected president.

KERRY: Well if he thinks traveling to a country is foreign policy experience that shows his inexperience. Dealing with nations in the context of treaties, arms control, national security issue, war and peace, those are the tests of experience and he does not have experience in dealing with that.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

WOODRUFF: John Kerry, talking with me just this afternoon in Manchester, New Hampshire. We'll have more of that interview with Senator Kerry tomorrow on INSIDE POLITICS.

http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0309/03/ip.00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Thank You. Thank You Very Much. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathappened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. judy did'nt stand a chance
today , kerry had her by the ears and would'nt let go , it made me proud to hear someone shut this shit down , they can't ask a question and let someone answer , they have to keep pounding on the same shit over and over , maybe she will start to think about who is paying her and quit and get a good job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. I heard about that and I hope it's a sign of the end of Dems
playing nice with the punditheads/whoremongers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC