Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone watch Tweety the last 2 nights?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 10:48 AM
Original message
Anyone watch Tweety the last 2 nights?
for the past two evenings Tweety has been bashing Clinton (what else is new?) and blaming Clinton and not Bush (and the bulge in his pants) for 911. He said that Clinton had special relationships with the saudis and did NOTHING to prevent 911 and did not attack al queda when he had a chance to do it. Of course Tweety does not mention the Milleneum Terrorist Attacks that Clinton prevented and the fact that Clinton wanted to go after Bin Laden but the CIA said no way!

My wife and I were laughing the entire time we had the channel on HARDBALL. I mean if Tweety's ass is itching him he would probably blame Clinton. 100 years from now Clinton will be blamed for World War Four. Will blaming Clinton ever end. All Clinton ever did for this country is give it economic prosperity and for the most part world peace. When will the blame Clinton game ever end? Maybe never!

Of course Tweety does not mention that Bush could possibly be responsible for 911. Bush would never let this country down. He is too much of a patriotic man to ever do that. He is too moral to not pay attention to real threats against our country. NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Clinton's "special relationship" with the Saudis
Edited on Fri Sep-05-03 10:55 AM by Gloria
was that he asked them a few times to knock off funding suspicious groups....

the same people the Bush's do business with (isn't THAT special??)
And, I suppose, picking up binLaden relatives all over the country and ferrying them out of the US when no one was supposed to be flying after 911 isn't "special."



You know, there comes a time when this stuff isn't just political crap...it's downright IRRESPONSIBLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. mainstream media crossed the Irresponsible line two years ago
and are now well in the parameters of ludicrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Tweety also ignores some facts!!
Edited on Fri Sep-05-03 11:00 AM by illini
Like, Clinton did a lot of things to counter terrorism. In fact if whistle ass had been doing his job pre 911 it might not have happened.
Read Al Franken's new book. I documents some of Clinton's anti-terror efforts. There are more!!!!


:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. The thing that bothers me about people that blame Clinton
Is the simple fact that if Clinton had enough information and assets to prevent 9/11, shouldn't that suggest that Bush had the means and info to stop it?

I am tired of this "Bush is a victim" bullshit.

Victim of what?
9/11 brought Bush nothing but success, wealth, and popularity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why doesn't any talking head ask this question:
If the Bush Administration is so blameless in regards to 9/11, then why wouldn't they have WELCOMED a full 9/11 Investigation rather than oppose an investigation at every point?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well, I think we all remember the Millennium attacks
Oh wait, there weren't any because Clinton was on the job. Eight months after being sworn in, Al Qaeda had a pretty good idea what sort of man was in the White House in September 2001, and rated their chances accordingly. They'd seen Chimpy and his penchant for secrecy, his grovelling to the Chinese after the spy plane was captured, his obsequiousness in enlisting the Russians to get the pieces of the plane back, and his innate laziness in taking a month off when he hadn't even been in the job for a year.

No, the September 11 attacks were made possible because of the lazy frat boy squatting in the Oval Office. And considering that they've pretty much gotten away with it, it looks like Al Qaeda was absolutely correct in their assessment. Chimpy's spent the two years since that awful day spinning his wheels, running his mouth, and looting the treasury, but he doesn't look to be any closer to bringing the surviving perpetrators to justice than he was the day he was running like a rabbit, trying to get out of harm's way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Repukes Are Quickly Using Up Their "Blame Clinton" cards
They can try it for the entire 4 years AWOL is in office, but what if the repukes actually win and the country is still screwed in 2008? Do they think they'll still be able to ride that tired old train??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. Blame 9-11 on Clinton? Why not?
Rove puts the word out. The media whores parrot what he says, without qualifying it with facts. Bush slides home free. What's next blame the Iraqi war on Clinton? BS.

We first started watching Tweety a few years ago. At that time, he used to get a lot of insider Washington information that hadn't been reported yet. I think though now with all his Clinton bashing over the years, his sources dried up and he's no longer privy to inside information so he's had to resort to sensationalism to be cutting edge.

Bye, bye Chris. I think your days are numbered. No one buys your spin and lies anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unknown Known Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. Tweety has been given his orders
You always know when the walls are closing in - they attack Clinton. The walls I am referring to are the two stories which have broken back into mainstream media this week and prove without a doubt the Bush/bin Laden connection -

1) Richard Clark publicly stating that members of Saudi royals, as well as bin Laden family members, were flown out of the US after 9/11 when no other flights were allowed. WH had to have approved this.

2) Peter Lance's new book, "1000 Years For Revenge", which is getting big play on all the media right now - tracing the lapses in anti-terrorism back to Bush I WH/FBI and continuing into Louis Freeh's FBI.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. The great irony is that before Clinton was another Bush
This leap-frog line of argument, blaming the present on what came before, can go on ad infinitum. If Clinton is responsible for 9/11 then Bush I must be responsible for the '93 WTC bombing, which set the stage and came earlier in Clinton's term than 9/11 in Bush II's.

Actually I thought Miniter, author of "Losing bin Laden", came off very weak and unconvincing on Tweety's show, but if anyone doubts that G.E. keeps Mathews around as a spare Russert, ask why they schedule such fake journalism in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starpass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. Bet I know why he's doing this
Someone yesterday posted the ratings. At 250,000 viewers Tweety was basically dead last. Maybe Oberman was below him; but Tweety is goooooing down. And again they fight over the same repuke crumbs rather than trying a different approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. The whoremedia seeks to diminish the impact of the "28 missing pages"
in the 9/11 report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC