|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
susu369
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 08:03 AM Original message |
Current spin: Nanny Problems Plagued CLINTON Nominations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
1. Of course they'll go for that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
2. The Clinton Administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 08:06 AM Response to Original message |
3. Yeah, they aren't mentioning the Hustler employed son, the 2 million |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snippy
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 08:21 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I think it is Gonzales' stepson who worked for Hustler. However, your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flordehinojos
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 08:55 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. the CURRICULUM VITAE items that you've just posted on Kerik'squalification |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snippy
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 09:05 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. True. But democrats should not allow republicans to say that Kerik's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flordehinojos
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 09:10 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. we should all write/e-mail mainstream media to remind them of Linda Chavez |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donhakman
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 10:09 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. for off the top of your head |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mika
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
8. That's how we got Janet Reno, who went on to appoint Ken Starr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BiggJawn
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
9. They're laying on the whitewash really thick, aren't they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
11. Clinton's penis never paid taxes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donhakman
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 10:49 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Kerik |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
13. Leaving out Chavez in the article is unforgivable, but.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waywest
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
14. Red herring.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spguilty
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
15. it's true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-04 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
16. Not "spin." It's "damage control." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 03:33 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC