|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-04 11:50 AM Original message |
3 Generals tell Tim we need 100,000 more soldiers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-04 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
1. Why just generals. There is an anti-war movement Pumpkin Head! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-04 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. 100,000 MORE FOR SHRUBS OBJECTIVE!democracy my ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimshoes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-04 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. How would you like to be the bushco stooge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTwentyoNine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-04 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. Huh...there won't be an "out" after 24 months pretty soon... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-04 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
5. troop strength is authorized by Congress and does not require a draft. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-04 12:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Yep. We have prisons full of guys that would happily "volunteer." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-04 12:36 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. you shouldn't be so snarky ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-04 01:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. First, I have no credibility, but many of my arguments do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Jan 05th 2025, 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC