Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why We Know Iraq is Lying - a redux

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ozymandius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 10:00 PM
Original message
Why We Know Iraq is Lying - a redux
I thought it would be interesting to compare what Condoleezza Rice issued as her categorical indictment of Iraq in the NY times op-ed page. In retrospect, the whole column is laughable. And outright fraudulent. In redacted form, here are some of the most interesting paragraphs.

By Condoleezza Rice
Originally appeared in the New York Times on January 23, 2003


<..first five paragraphs omitted..>

For example, the declaration fails to account for or explain Iraq's efforts to get uranium from abroad, its manufacture of specific fuel for ballistic missiles it claims not to have, and the gaps previously identified by the United Nations in Iraq's accounting for more than two tons of the raw materials needed to produce thousands of gallons of anthrax and other biological weapons.

Iraq's declaration even resorted to unabashed plagiarism, with lengthy passages of United Nations reports copied word-for-word (or edited to remove any criticism of Iraq) and presented as original text. Far from informing, the declaration is intended to cloud and confuse the true picture of Iraq's arsenal. It is a reflection of the regime's well-earned reputation for dishonesty and constitutes a material breach of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441, which set up the current inspections program.

<..cut..>

Last week's finding by inspectors of 12 chemical warheads not included in Iraq's declaration was particularly troubling. In the past, Iraq has filled this type of warhead with sarin a deadly nerve agent used by Japanese terrorists in 1995 to kill 12 Tokyo subway passengers and sicken thousands of others. Richard Butler, the former chief United Nations arms inspector, estimates that if a larger type of warhead that Iraq has made and used in the past were filled with VX (an even deadlier nerve agent) and launched at a major city, it could kill up to one million people. Iraq has also failed to provide United Nations inspectors with documentation of its claim to have destroyed its VX stockpiles.

Many questions remain about Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and arsenal and it is Iraq's obligation to provide answers. It is failing in spectacular fashion. By both its actions and its inactions, Iraq is proving not that it is a nation bent on disarmament, but that it is a nation with something to hide. Iraq is still treating inspections as a game. It should know that time is running out.

<end>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Condoleezza?
more like Condolences, her career is now deader than a doornail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Condiliar is the chief propagandist of the Chimpadministration.
Tom Ridge replaced her as security chief since she couldn't "connect the dots" pre-9/11.

The Chimp is protective of her because their fortunes are tied to that fateful day in September 2001. Rummy and Cheney have forced them to link Iraq and 9/11 to keep focus off of Condi's failing to protect the country. Her sole function now is to promote misinformation under the guise of national security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC