This is frickin absurd! If you live in KS, you've probably heard about this trial throughout the past couple years, or if not, I'm sure you've heard about Tom Delay's interactions with them, which led to one of his slaps on the wrist from the Ethics Committee. The two execs, (one of which has already been sentenced to 4 1/2 years in an "unrelated" money laundering case) David Wittig and Doug Lake were facing 40 counts- one count of conspiracy, one count of forfeiture, 14 counts of circumvention of internal controls, seven counts of wire fraud and 17 counts of money laundering.
Apparently, the jury said it was unable to reach a unanimous decision on the first 22 counts of the 40-count indictment, which itself is amazing, but the jury had reached a unanimous decision on counts 23 through 39. But the judge said that a “partial verdict” was not acceptable and declared a mistrial as to all the counts! What the hell is wrong with a "partial verdict"? They were found GUILTY, why on earth would the judge dismiss the charges?
I've been following this case from the begining, not only because I'm a Westar customer, but because I go to Kansas University where 6 Westar Execs at the time were on the KU Endowment Funds executive committee, which deals with a lot of donations made to KU and the Alumni Association. I tried to get our local and University newspapers to investigate their "investing strategy" for the endowment fund, but most of it is "private".
http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/local/10463657.htm?1c