|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
nostamj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:08 PM Original message |
AAR Reporting: 19 US soldiers now confirmed killed in Mosul attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. the straws are piling up on that camel's back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Worst Username Ever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
2. Not the highest day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Worst Username Ever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
3. Confirmed by CNN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SodoffBush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
4. Just the ticket Bush needs to justify Rumsfeld's importance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
latteromden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
5. CNN reporting 20, also 22, and 24. It makes my head spin. Any way you cut |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. 24 total, 19 soliders n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lebkuchen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Whatever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:29 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. True that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lebkuchen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. All the more reason to hold those Iraqi "elections" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:38 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Sadly, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lebkuchen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:44 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. The 1ID has lost over 60 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
latteromden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 09:48 PM Response to Reply #7 |
20. Ah, gotcha. Thanks. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sara Beverley (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
6. 19 "confirmed" There may be some "unconfirmed" Wounded=? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:22 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. wounded = 60+ n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Confirmed means they have identified them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dyedinthewoolliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
8. Where I live |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gnofg (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
14. send the twins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
15. 63 U.S. Casualties in Dec. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
latteromden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:59 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Nearly 1,500... *sigh* How many more have to die for a mistake? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-21-04 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
18. in a macabre sort of way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 20th 2025, 07:22 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC