|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Poiuyt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-24-04 04:14 PM Original message |
How is depleted uranium used by our military and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-24-04 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. It poisons the ground and all the people who come into contact with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-24-04 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
2. because it makes defense contractors rich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyRingo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-24-04 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
3. I believe it's a matter of density (heavier than lead etc) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-24-04 04:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Passes through armor like it isn't even there... becomes aerosoled, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
klyon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 04:04 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. that's right, it is really hard stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 04:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. This is incorrect (anti-aircraft "wall") |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingshakabobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 04:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. JR may have been referring to the Phalanx System |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 06:37 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. I'm familiar with Phalanx |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingshakabobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 09:00 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Tom Clancy, is that you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paintedlady (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-24-04 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. It's used to incinerate tanks, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skeptic_All (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-24-04 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
6. Though controversy surrounds the use of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 05:56 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Yeah there's always "much debate" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
7. It's used as antitank bullets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
8. Essentially super-dense incendiary ammunition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
9. Someone here has the facts wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 04:07 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Contamination yes, radiation, no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Massacure (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 08:28 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Yes it is radioactive, but not any more so than natural uranium. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudbluestater (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
13. Vanity Fair Dec. 2004 Issue Article by David Rose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
19. It's used because it's heavy. They could use |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Jan 05th 2025, 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC