DU THIS POLL

[Jack_Dawson]

Should the U.S. do more to help the Tsunami Victims?

(Currently 54% Yes, 46% No...fucking San Diego)

Results in a half hour.

www.nbc739.com

[Goldeneye]

1. done.

[NAO]

2. done - with comment on online polls and results so far

Online polls always seem to come out around 60% sane; 40% nuts.

For months I watched all the online polls with an eye to the Bush/Kerry numbers. And they were pretty consistently Bush 40% / Kerry 60%. Oddly enough, other polls, not about the election or candidates, but about the issues, also came in about 60% sane and 40% nuts. I saw this in everything from "how is the war going" to "should gays be allowed to marry" to "was Janet Jackson's boob a transgression against decency".

[Blue Gardener]

3. Yes at 56%

Those people who vote no better hope they never need disaster aid. I would hate for them to be hypocrites by accepting help.

[coreystone]

4. 56% = "compassionate conservatism" at it's best!.......

I guess some of us are much too comfortable to concern ourselves with "real life"!


:-(

[Jack_Dawson]

5. Thx for your help everyone...

Jacked it up a couple % points. Go DU!

:toast:

[idiosyncratic]

6. Done . . . and how can 40% of the people be so heartless?

:cry:

[TeeYiYi]

7. 58

TYY

[Az]

8. Done, and the reason they are heartless

is because it has no impact on them and its not being marketted to them. Attacking Iraq was marketted. There was an agenda. A sudden disaster in a distant land without oil or power has no impact on those that make policy. Therefor they see no reason to force it before the eyes of the public.