Of course, and as always, no rebuttal of the case made. Just smart-assed, dismissive quips:
Loony tunes
Michael Meacher, who served as a Labour minister until three months ago, made an extraordinary series of allegations in an article published yesterday. He began by accusing the US of seeking world domination - a routine charge in Left-wing circles - but then went several, rather unusual, stages further.
In discussing why the US went to war against Iraq, he argued that "the truth may be a great deal murkier" than is commonly thought. He suggested that the US government did nothing to prevent the attacks of September 11, and then - once they had begun to unfold - deliberately did nothing to intercept them. Mr Meacher asks: "Could US air security operations have been deliberately stood down on September 11? If so, why, and on whose authority?" Furthermore, "no serious attempt has ever been made to catch Bin Laden".
The gist of Mr Meacher's conclusion is that the US government was prepared to see thousands of its citizens murdered to provide a convenient excuse for a series of conquering wars. This is a most novel theory. We look forward to more articles by him: "Aliens: why they choose to live among us" or "The cabal of jealous starlets who killed Marilyn Monroe" and "The coded Confederate message in the Gettysburg Address."
http://www.opinion.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2003/09/07/dl0702.xml&sSheet=/opinion/2003/09/07/ixopinion.htmlAnd from another piece in the Sunday Telegraph:
"Meacher allegations over September 11 'monstrous', says US":
...
"One senior Whitehall aide said last night: 'It's the stuff of fantasy. It's not like him to say something so stupid.' A minister with close links to Downing Street disagreed, saying: 'The only mystery is why we kept him in government for so long.'"
http://www.opinion.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;$sessionid$LYB5PD3ZH2GNBQFIQMFCFF4AVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2003/09/07/nmeach07.xml
Anyone need a refresher on The Telegraph's links to Richard Perle?