|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
arwalden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 12:24 PM Original message |
Bush* Clearly Stated That There Would Not Be A Draft... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fertilizeonarbusto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. So he lied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 12:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Read my lips: No New Taxes (My euphemisms for "the draft") |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jesus H. Christ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
2. It wouldn't be the first time he directly lied... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
3. ther won't be a draft. the Iraq war will be declared a victory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueFlu (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
4. In Bush speak, I am sure they will come up with a term like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 12:29 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. It will be called the Fuller Employment Act of 2005 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
murray hill farm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 12:52 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. yes..that is how it will happen...and no "act of 2005" required! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HockeyMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 01:02 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. Leave No Child Behind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neweurope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
6. He's got a man-date now... and how many would oppose him if after |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllyCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
7. Keep making people poor and don't create new jobs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllegroRondo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
9. Mandatory military service for unemployed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durablend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 12:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Never mind forget to check the box... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
11. He also said there would be no cuts to SS benefits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 01:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Beat Me To It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
12. There won't be a draft, just a mandatory temporary human resource |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flygal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
15. *cough* bullshit *cough* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
17. And if that stop-loss is extended for 27 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drthais (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-05 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
19. Yes....it will be called |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC