|
Edited on Fri Jan-07-05 02:43 PM by ProfessorPlum
The GOP argument on this goes something like this:
IF at some point in the future, the federal government is so irresponsible with the revenue and spending for the general fund (perhaps, for example, issuing huge tax cuts for the very rich, income tax cuts for top earners, elimination of the inheritance tax, reduction of taxes on investment income, while at the same time starting massively expensive, unnecessary foreign wars, in which war profiteers misappropriate nauseating amounts of taxpayer money), IF the finances of the general fund are driven into a ditch
AND
IF the government ends up relying so heavily on its wage tax income for general fund expenses that they decide that they need to declare a “crisis” so that they can justify killing off Social Security, allowing the greedheads in charge of the country to screw over retired people (current and future)
AND
IF the people of this country let them do it
THEN Social Security really is at risk if its only assets are IOUs.
(See how if you follow their argument it implicates them? Weird. The more observant among you may notice that we are officially at step three now, and so my thread title is only partially facetious. SS really is in danger. From the GOP.)
|