One must be aware of the history of this issue as well as the first amendment's Separation of Church and State . . .
First of all, the words "under God" were added to the Pledge of Allegiance in 1954. How were those words added? The words "under God" were added to the Pledge when the Roman Catholic Church's Knights of Columbus petitioned the government to include the words. And, congress did so. Congress added those religious words due to a religious sect petitioning the government to do so. That's a very important historical fact in this case.
http://exit3.i-55.com/~minkusmj/Pledge.htmlWhat the hell is our government doing? Surely, one may reason, correctly, that
congressional intent, here, was to place religion within state dealings. The state, here, is public schools. Children say the Pledge in public schools. Therefore, there is a defeat of the first amendment's Separation of Church and State. A constitutional violation of that clause. Here, there's co-mingling of Church and State when children in public schools say the Pledge with the words "under God."
This is nothing more than common sense particularly when looking at the history of the words "under God."
So if the public schools (and/or other state institutions) want to contest the court actions brought by parents who object to their children being exposed to the co-mingling of Church and State, then don't blame the parents or the children. Instead, blame the public schools and/or the state who force such litigation and the expense of this litigation.
All of this is why I shed crocodile tears in my post #1 (above) for the "five local school districts being sued" who are complaining through their attorney that the litigation has the potential to cost money for the schools to defend. Hey, why are the schools in court? Why not just drop the Pledge? Note, too, that it's the attorney who is trying to "score points" for his legal position . . . try pity for the schools in the public forum of camera and microphone and news reports! Nothing like "trying your case in the news media" and not the courtroom!
And you bit too..