Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

British Museum expert called to give evidence in trial over 'ossuary of Je

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 11:54 AM
Original message
British Museum expert called to give evidence in trial over 'ossuary of Je
Sunday TelegraphBy Inigo Gilmore
(Filed: 09/01/2005)

A wealthy Israeli art collector and an Egyptologist who works for the British Museum have been named as key prosecution witnesses in the trial of five men accused of running the world's biggest ring of dealers in bogus religious artefacts.

The sophisticated forgeries, which were sold for tens of millions of pounds, allegedly include an ossuary, or burial box, whose ancient Aramaic inscription suggests that it once held the bones of "James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus".

It caused a worldwide sensation when it surfaced in 2002, hailed by archaeologists and academics as the most significant Judaeo-Christian find ever unearthed.

Israel's Antiquities Authority, however, recently declared it a fake and prosecutors in Jerusalem claim that leading authorities who authenticated it were duped. The scandal threatens to undermine Israel's rich tradition of biblical archaeology and embarrass international institutions - including the British Museum, according to Israeli police - where some works were exhibited.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/01/09/wrelic09.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/01/09/ixworld.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Saw a discussion of it on PBS
It was such a clumsy fake that only a rabid believer would have bought it: the carving was from two different periods, in two different styles with the "brother of Jesus" added much, much later. Even my untrained eyes could see where it changed. The "James, son of Joseph" was straight and well done; the "brother of Jesus" trailed off at an angle with crooked letters. The difference in patina was also obvious, even on TV.

Believers have left themselves looking just a little desperate over this stuff. Believe if you want to, but realize that the history of the region makes it extremely unlikely you'll find anything from the period you're looking for, much less the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleBallots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. the prosecutor said they had duped experts at museums across
the world, and that they all need to look at any "ancient artifacts" they have aquired recently.

"Believers have left themselves looking just a little desperate over this stuff."

Yes, the believers in the traditional history of the "ancient world" - expecially, the so-called skepical, scientific ones, got taken for a ride the last 20 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. This is one of the key problems with the historical Jesus
There is a need to believe on the part of the believers. They will blind themself to obvious flaws to find something to show he existed. It is often more a matter of fighting emotions than finding evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleBallots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. yes, also the Historical Moses, David, Solomon
or Dante and Homer for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC