|
I know a lot of DUers feel patriotic and patriotism is supposed to be a good thing, and nationalism is sort of patriotism taken a little further...
...but it all is of a piece to me. It seems weird to love boundary lines or geography or even an entire population in the abstract. I mean, why "love" America? I'm not even sure that "allegiance" is all that hot a thing to pledge. What if America's boundary lines ended at the Mississippi, and west of that was New America? I'm supposed to love one and not the other? And I'm supposed to be loyal to a country that has policies I hate? What's the "country" then? The land? The property people within those boundary lines own? A gazillion people I've never even met?
Is the country its laws, which stink much of the time, or its Constitution, which is a fine document that seems to be paid little attention in real life?
And if I'm supposed to love America because it's so great, and I don't think it's so great, I guess that makes me a traitor?
I don't know...it all seems so...well, silly.
I can understand (kind of) why people might love their culture and what it has produced, but culture is boundary-less. And every culture that I can think of has produced some horrible things...
So we're talking unconditional love? We're supposed to love our country like a child or parent or spouse? Or are we supposed to be more like co-dependent lovers: "I can fix this country with my love!" By being "patriotic" are we being "enablers" instead?
A "country" just seems so arbitrary. Take Iraq, for instance, which was created as a country by Britain back in the 1920s, I believe. Someone just said, okay here's your map -- now you're "Iraq."
It's weird. I guess I'm weird. The pledge of allegiance always bothered me as a kid. I'd think, What's the big deal about being an undivided nation? And "under God"? What's God, really? Liberty and Justice sound like good ideas, though...
|