|
I shared this with some repub friends of mine in hopes they would admit they may have %$#@*! up...
This pretty much sums up why I feel so many were backing the war at it's beginning stages...
Here's my point, I think the psychology is prepared right now that if there is a war, a relatively short one (no matter where), American's and our allies would feel so good that that would really energize the whole process of believing in our government...
As was the case 2 years ago, but is now falling short.
It's not just those who opposed it in the first place, it is those (fence sitters) who supported it based on what our government told us which now seems to be inevitably false...
Here's a cheap analogy:
You look up at that little sticker in your window that reads 47,550 miles for your next oil change, and then you look down at your odometer and realize you have passed that mileage, but your car is running fine and you know you have time...
ie, no immanent threat, so it doesn't bother you, and you change your oil when you have time...
This is the end result of you making a decision based on your feelings and what you are doing at that time.
Now, say you are driving along (same scenario) and your engine starts knocking loudly...
ie, immanent threat, right? First thing you do is drive straight to your mechanic and get ready to pay whatever it costs to fix the problem, right?
This decision is based on the fact that you are in immediate danger of losing something you must have, and have a fear it will it only get worse if you fail to fix it now.
Do you see my point?
The reason we were led blindly into Iraq was because our engine, aka the government, was knocking...(terrorism, WMDs, Saddam)
Now I am not criticizing anyone's choices at this point, but don't you feel your engine was knocking prematurely which caused you to spend (with your emotions) money for unneeded repairs?
|