|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
ClevelandSportsCurse (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:30 PM Original message |
Poll question: So will Fahrenheit 9/11 be nominated for Best Picture in the Oscars? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleonora (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. not just because they want to make a political statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. I didn't think it was eligible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleonora (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. oooh I bet you're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClevelandSportsCurse (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. That was for Best Documentary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobweaver (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. What I heard is, that made it ineligible for Best Documentary, but it's... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockedthevoteinMA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Yes that's what I heard too- he wanted to get it out before the election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. I believe you are right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VALibby (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 05:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
19. This is what I thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 10:16 AM Response to Reply #19 |
34. Hi VALibby!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatholicEdHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
8. Political Oscars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Emboldened Chimp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
9. No, it won't, and not because the Academy is afraid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:15 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Where is "Ray?" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 05:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
22. I agree .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
10. Moore took it our of the running because he was in negotiations to air it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClevelandSportsCurse (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. See post #4 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 04:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. No, he took it out of best documentary to compete for best picture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
13. Voted for the top line on F. 9/11 . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
14. Deleted message |
CyberSon (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 04:47 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. critics would... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 04:57 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. "Aviator" won the best picture at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 05:07 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Deleted message |
AnnInLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
18. Just read in the newspaper, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 05:10 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Up against Martin Scorsese, too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
23. I hope those "Hollywood types" are mad enough to push MM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 10:34 AM Response to Reply #23 |
35. My "Hollywood Type" Hub Put F-9/11 On His Best Pic List |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
24. It will win Best Documentary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 01:15 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. It's ineligible for Best Documentary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 01:34 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. I thought the cable people withdrew the contract? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 01:48 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. I don't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tacos al Carbon (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 01:18 AM Response to Reply #24 |
29. It's not eligible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 01:05 AM Response to Original message |
25. Both 1 and 2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 01:12 AM Response to Original message |
26. It would be the perfect time for "those Hollwood types" to send a message |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paulie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
27. The Incredibles was better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tacos al Carbon (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 01:26 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. The Inedibles was good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 05:55 AM Response to Original message |
33. Will Be Nominated But Won't Win? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jan 04th 2025, 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC