Well, if democracy can't be "instant" why did we remove Saddam instead
hector459
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 10:26 AM
Original message |
| Well, if democracy can't be "instant" why did we remove Saddam instead |
|
of working with him toward a more democratic country? Haven't we given other dictators much worse than Saddam more time and the benefit of negotiations? Aren't we now best buds with China and Pakistan?
|
| BlueEyedSon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Because he needed to be disarmed of his nonexistant WMDs, |
|
using the nonextistant oil revenues.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Mon Jan 20th 2025, 02:10 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
