Seriously, I was reading a Washington Post piece on Richard Mellon Scaife written back in 1999, and I could not help but be struck by the similarities in their lives and personalities.
Both were spoiled rich boys and alcoholics. Both have a world view that does not allow for shades of gray. Neither likes to read. Both appear to have been shaped and influenced by ideologues who have opportunistically latched onto them. Both are cruelly vindictive and tolerate no dissent from employees, friends.
<snip>
Despite his demons and his difficulties, Scaife and the Mellon fortune he inherited have prevailed. The money didn't buy a happy childhood or the personal confidence he has always lacked, but for all the distractions of his complicated life, he has, at 66, established an imposing legacy. With the help of a few longtime aides and of the conservatives who got his money – people who made him feel useful and appreciated – Richard Mellon Scaife became the leading financial supporter of the movement that reshaped American politics in the last quarter of the 20th century.
<snip>
Some of his associates speculated that drinking contributed to a mean streak they saw in Scaife. Others weren't sure the drinking was a factor. From the time he was a teenager, Scaife earned the reputation of a bully. His sister recalled one occasion when, home in Ligonier on a vacation from Deerfield, he got caught by the police making prank phone calls. "The police gave him a polite talking-to, but Dick was totally unconcerned," Cordelia May said. "The police didn't frighten him at all."
<snip>
So Scaife is as kind to friends as he can be harsh to perceived enemies. James Whelan, the founding editor of the Washington Times who worked for Scaife when he owned the Sacramento Union, said this was characteristic. Scaife's world, Whelan said, is starkly divided between allies and adversaries. "If you're not my friend, you're my enemy – he lives by that kind of code."
More...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/c...