Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Donate to Bush or else, drug companies told staff

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 08:46 PM
Original message
Donate to Bush or else, drug companies told staff
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/09/05/1062549020461.html

During the 2000 presidential campaign in the US, executives at Bristol-Myers Squibb, one of America's largest drug companies, received an urgent message: Donate money to George Bush.

The message did not come from Republican campaign officials. It came from top Bristol-Myers executives, according to four executives who say they donated to Mr Bush under pressure from their bosses.

The four, who asked not to be named, said they were told to donate the maximum - $US1000 ($1500) in their own name and $US1000 in their spouse's - and if they failed to do so, their names would be forwarded to the company's then chief executive, Charles Heimbold.

Federal election law bars companies from using coercion to force a person to make a political contribution.

A spokesman for Bristol-Myers, John Skule, said on Thursday that while "we ask for active participation in the political process," no one was forced to donate.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh I love that
"No one was forced to donate"

Rethugs are great at that shit.

Send a memo saying "Refusal to donate will result in your name sent to the chief executive", but claim that they donated under their free will.

They did everything but directly threaten these peoples jobs.

Nothing like good, old fashioned intimidation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Even if this is true, no one will be prosecuted
The only way a federal investigation will be opened would be if the state attorney general looks into the matter. Then the federal investigation will pre-empt the state investigation, just like California's criminal investigation of Ken Lay and Enron is pre-empted the federal "probe."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC