Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If they tried to amend the constitution to stop Blacks from marrying each

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bobweaver Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 09:59 PM
Original message
If they tried to amend the constitution to stop Blacks from marrying each
other, or if they tried to amend the constitution to prevent Jews from marrying each other, or if they tried to amend the constitution to prevent vegetarians from marrying each other, what would the response be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ermoore Donating Member (474 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well . . .
. . . it wouldn't be anything like the response to banning homosexuals from marrying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sure it would
Scratch a Repuglican true believer, find somebody who thinks Jim Crow laws were a great idea and those segregated facilities made everybody a lot happier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm white and I would make sure that never happens
My girlfriend is a Somali, and one of the reasons why I oppose marriage amendments so much (besides just the Anti-GLBT hate that these proponents of the marriage amendments have) is that I have read about it used to be acceptable for the states to rule that it is illegal for a white person to marry a non-white person.

If that happened today I would be upset to no end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. This is NOT ancient history!
Marriage of a white person with a Negro or mulatto or a person who shall have one-eighth or more of Negro blood is prohibited.


This South Carolina Law Was Not Repealed Until 1998. Alabama finally removed it's Ban on Interracial Marriage on November 8, 2000. In one rural Alabama country, (Washington), the voters actually rejected the proposition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I know
I am frightened because of this.

First they'll come and oppress the GLBT couples and then I am sure they will come after people like us.

Take Jerry Falwell. Today, he is 'defending' marriage. But, just a couple of decades ago, he was calling MLK a Communist and defending Segregation.

Everybody needs to stop believing the lies, and look at these so called 'defenders' of marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Nahhhhhhhh
They are just going after all middle class( Liberal) people regardless of whom you love!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WMliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. it was already on most stae books until the middle of this century.
As well as intermarriage between the races.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. 1967 SCOTUS
overturned the ban on interracial marriage....BUT as stated above it took until 2000 for all states to agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WMliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. wow, thanks for being the walk, talking wikipedia
:yourock:

yeah, South Carolina was the last to comply. For once, my Virginia was not the least common denominator of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Your welcome BUT
read above Alabama was the last in 2000! Can you belive that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Your welcome BUT
read above Alabama was the last in 2000! Can you beleive that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. well, if you gave rush, o'reilly, and hannity a chance to sell it first...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Vegitarians can't MARRY!
It's unnatural!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberallyInclined Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. none of the groups you mentioned are abominations in the eyes of god,
Edited on Tue Feb-01-05 11:27 PM by LiberallyInclined
so why would anyone want to prevent them from marrying, and to what end?

Disclaimer- personally, I'm an atheist and therefore do not buy into the "abomination" thing...unfortunately the people who put the people in power into positions of power do, so it's their twisted thinking you have to be concerned with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC