Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did y'all see Dick Morris column on Gore and Hillary?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DealsGapRider Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 10:31 AM
Original message
Did y'all see Dick Morris column on Gore and Hillary?
Now, I don't have much time for Morris, but he is occasionally insightful. He's suggesting that, "Democrats are slowly waking up to the possibility that they may have the '04 election in their grasp, only to throw it away on the Dean candidacy. This is generating tremendous intra-party pressure on Gore and Hillary to run."

Does anyone believe that? I don't. I think the party is increasingly optimistic that Dean will pimp slap Bush. I think the only people who think Dean is unelectable are the pundits.

http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/5261.htm

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. First of all
There is no guarantee that Dean is going to be the nominee. He may or may not win Iowa, and will almost certainly win New Hampshire, but States like California, Illinois, Missouri, and Texas are much more populated and therefore have more delegates than the aforementioned states. So it seems that maybe Morris is off base here. Why don't we just wait and see how this all plays out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. & First, First-of-All, MORRIS Is Roy COHN's Cousin
Not only is he almost always wrong, few people are so worthy of being ad-hominemed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not just the pundits who are starting to see the light about Dean's
chances of winning the nomination and election, but Dean's supporters, who number over 360,000, were convinced a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. NEVER listen to toe-licker Morris...!
Other than being a sexual deviant- he's also an accomplished liar who wishes no good will toward Democrats.

I wouldn't believe a word Morris said even if I was standing in the middle of a hurricane and Dick predicted rain.

Really- he's a second rate tool.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Took the words right out of my mouth.......
:hi: No further comment needed. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DealsGapRider Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Awesome Zogby graph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. Fuck Dick Morris
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
37. Actually, I think he's right...
I think Hillary will run. Go girl!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sventvkg Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. This Morris Guy is a complete idiot and his opionions SHARPLY differ from
most others else i have heard. I do agree that should Gore get in the race He could beat Bush's ASS, but here are some quotes...

"But the Democrats know that the president has an ace up his sleeve: Howard Dean. This ultra-liberal, who Bush could defeat with his eyes closed, is racing into the lead in the Democratic field."

Complete nonsense...Shows he knows nothing of DEAN.

"My guess is that Hillary would be just as happy to see Dean win the nomination and get slaughtered in November by Bush. That would make W a two-term president despite having no real base of popularity, and open the way for her to run in 2008. Since Dean has no chance of beating Bush, she needn't worry that an incumbent Democratic president would bar her way until 2012, when she'll be 65."

I would have a hard time believing this.


"But Hillary would be most unhappy to see Gore get the nod. Since Al would be a good bet to win, her nightmare scenario of a Bush defeat and no open field in 2008 would be coming to pass. So should Gore begin to make a move, Hillary will likely get into the race to pre-empt him."

Or this:


"Why is Bush falling so badly? The superficial reasons are the Iraq casualties, the failure to find WMDs and the continuing inability to round up Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. But the real reason is that terror is receding as an issue, largely due to Bush's success.

The solution for Bush is to put terrorism back on the front burner by high profile and aggressive action against Iran and/or North Korea. It's not necessary to wag the dog, but Bush should wag his tongue and raise the profile of these two remaining threats to our security."

That is scary.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Those Last Two Paragraphs!!!!
Man, this guy is a lunatic. What successes? Because we didn't get hit again. We've only been hit about 10 times in our entire history, and half of those were internal terrorists.

I'd say the odds of more than one in 2 years is so low that it's not Bush's success but just dumb luck. (In Bush's case, the operative word is DUMB.)
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
22. he is full of it isn't he
Dean is not a liberal and Hilary and Bill aren't plotting for 2008 by hoping the 2004 candidate loses. That is typical snotty spew from Dick Morris.

And I agree Gore would Kick dubya's A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Still waiting for Clark
If he enters the race, it's a whole new game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sagan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. this is getting so obvious

The Whore Press is desperately twisting to find ways to talk about Gore, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton... ANYONE but the actual candidates.

It won't help them, though. The Chimp is going back to the zoo, come election time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kmla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. If Dicker the Toe Licker was any good at what he did....
.... he would still be able to find work as a political consultant. Instead, he works as a political pundit.

He is a two-bit 'hoe, and will go to where the money and attention are, and will say pretty much anything to get in the spotlight. Watching him on TV is sad, kinda like seeing Ted Nugent play free at the state fair. You just wish they would realize that they are past their prime and fade away into a well deserved anonymity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. I don't think Gore or Hillary could win.
They both have way too much baggage and are so hated by the right that a ticket with either of them on it would revitalize the conservative base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigendian Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. I contend that the republican base was whipped up in 2000.
They still couldn't muster the votes to defeat Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. Who's in the white house?
Not Gore. It should have been an easy win. Florida should have been irrelevant. Gore is a weaker candidate now and bush is a MUCH stronger candidate now. Gore is a poor campaigner bush is a relatively good campaigner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigendian Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. The fact is undisputed.
Gore got more votes than Bush or Clinton, for that matter. That race was fought like hell by Gore's people.
Why would someone who went to the pols and voted for Gore not do it again?
Now we can speculate on that all we want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. Dickie Morris
does everything he can to keep Hillary in the forefront (he lies a lot) so he can always have a job bashing the Clinton's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
14. I would never give a Morris article a hit by clicking on it
He has nothing to say that I want or need to hear. You even write that you disagree with the article.

I guess I could post an article negative about a candidate and then claim that I disagreed with it. That would be rather PSYOPish and avoid confrontation, but I'm not up for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DealsGapRider Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I'm just asking whether there's any enthusiasm among DUers...
...for either Gore or Hillary at this point. I don't sense any. I think we're doing fine with the candidates we've got, namely Howard Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. That's because the "Hillary will run" meme
is promoted by the corporate media as a way of avoiding coverage of the Democratic Candidates who are already in the running and making much progress. If Wesley Clark does not declare (I think he will) he will have performed the same function, taken some focus off the Democrats who have already declared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. At the risk of ticking off the Kerry people...
It's pretty much of a Dean thing right now- Hillary has pledged not to run anyway.

(I like Kerry too- get off my back Kerryites!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txprog Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
17. I saw it...
This "Dean can't win" stuff is getting old. Morris said he can't win because he signed "gay marriages" and is soft on terrorism. Simply not true, and a taste of the lies we will hear about Dean. Of course Dean signed "civil unions" and is not at all soft on terrorism. He will beat the drum on the war and more funding for homeland security. These issues can work to his favor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sven77 Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
20. Dick Morris
Dick Morris is a ass, I saw his book review on CSPAN "Off with there heads". He is just another spokesman for the global elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
21. I think the GOP is scared of Dean
So Dick the toe sucker is working for the GOP trying to push Hillary, before she's really ready for the job. I would vote for her, but am concerned that she wouldn't win in 2004. If Dean gets the nomination and picks Clark as his running mate, I think that would be a good ticket with a very good chance to take the election. I wasn't a Dean fan from the start, but have really liked both his message and the fact that he isn't what Bartcop calls a "pink-tutu democrat".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SEAburb Donating Member (985 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
23. Morris is right, Dean will lead to '84 - '88 redux
Dean supporters need to wake up before it's to late. Dean can't win the presidency with just the support of anti-war Democrats and that is all he will get.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. We'll see who wins the nomination...
Edited on Tue Sep-09-03 11:29 AM by Patriot_Spear
Thanks for your opinion. I'm fully awake and Dean is my candidate.

Of course I'm in a bit of a fringe group: A postgrad educated Army veteran who pays taxes and raises a family. I know- I'm a kooky "librul".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. What makes you think he only has the support
of anti-war democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DealsGapRider Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. I just can't imagine what's behind this sort of thinking.
I fail to see how Dean is perceived as unelectable. The biggest lightning rod I can think of is his support for civil unions for gays, and all he has to do to explain that in the South is to say that he believes that individual states should be able to make that decision without interference from the federal government. Aren't Southern conservatives in support of states' rights?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. "state rights" is a GOP code for de-constructing civil rights
This whole "Dean is unelectable" is a Rove/Lieberman/Bush* ruse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. GOP party line is "state's rights, state's rights, state's rights."
And for his entire tenure as a politician, it's been Dean's, too, on almost every controversial issue. That's why I DON'T like or trust Howard Dean. His sudden conversion to populist rhetoric doesn't sway me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HazMat Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. Do ya really think Southern Conservatives
are going to support Dean, even with the cowardly "state's rights" line he parrots ?

Sheesh.

Them voting for Dean would be like us voting for Delay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Hi HazMat!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. You need to wake up.
Dean's half the reason Bush is in trouble right now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HazMat Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. Ha ! Dean supporters wake up ?
If somehow "sheeple-powered-Howard" manages to get the nomination, the Deanieboppers will only wake up when BushCo stomps us on election day and dances all over the Democratic Party's grave. That is the only thing that will make the Dean supporters happy. Recent polls show that only 65% of NH Dean supporters think he can beat Bush, which means they are in this to wreck the party a la McGovern in '72.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
27. Dick Morris is a whore
I think he is just troling for a way to get into the game.....I don't think he is right and Hillary and Gore will not run. It would piss all the candidates off and then pundits would say that the party is in diarray.


And Besides I do not thin either Gore or Hillary can beat Bush.

Gore because well he is Gore and the electorate does not want a do-over.

Hillary because she surely would rally the GOP base against her..

I will make this prediction however. Should by some odd tist of fate Graham gets the nod....Hillary might be shortlisted for VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
31. Dick Morris....
I saw him on T.V. yesterday. He said
AWOL should start attacking Iran, that
this would make him popular and likely
to win in 04.

I don't believe that, people are sick
of AWOL's wars and all the mess it has
gotten us into. I think if he tried to
seriously threaten Iran the world would
rise up against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
39. This is interesting to me because I think Repubs are really scared of Dean
I keep hearing repubs talk of how Dean does not have a chance and why don't the dems run someone else. Now why would the repubs care so much about the dems getting a candidate that can win? And hy do they want us to run Lieberman/Gephardt/Kerry?

They are scared of Dean, and they should be scared of Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC