Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Berra Sues TBS Over 'Sex and the City' Ad

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 11:12 AM
Original message
Berra Sues TBS Over 'Sex and the City' Ad
Feb 2, 9:55 AM EST

Berra Sues TBS Over 'Sex and the City' Ad

NEW YORK (AP) -- Hall of Famer Yogi Berra has filed a $10 million lawsuit against TBS, claiming the cable television network sullied his name by using it in a racy advertisement for its "Sex and the City" reruns.

Berra's papers, filed in Manhattan's state Supreme Court, say the Turner Broadcasting System Inc. ad, which has appeared on buses and in subways, caused "severe damage to his reputation" with its reference to Kim Cattrall's sexually promiscuous character, Samantha.

The offending ad, Berra's court papers say, queried readers about the definition of "yogasm." Possible definitions: (a) a type of yo-yo trick, (b) sex with Yogi Berra and (c) what Samantha has with a guy from yoga class. The answer is (c).

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BBO_YOGI_BERRA_SEX_AD?SITE=CAANR&SECTION=ENTERTAINMENT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. That'll be worth something, but not 10 mil. What do you think he'lll get?
50,000 to a charity of his choice and a yogasm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, at least he didn't
burn himself with that nasty McDonald's coffee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Not to go off on a tangent
but you should really look at the facts from the "McDonald's coffee case" before using it as an example of "frivolous lawsuits", which I assume was your intention. There was nothing frivolous about it. http://lawandhelp.com/q298-2.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Unless he's broke, he needs to lighten up..
WHAT kind of harm, really, would that do to a public person? He should roll with it and sign a fat Viagra deal or something. Perhaps they meant Yogi Bear, that would have been funnier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Actually I think he has a case.
Famous people get paid to lend their name to products. They usually have to sign off their name and likeness to have it used in this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hell, I'd say it IMPROVED his reputation.
Watch him show up in Viagra ads, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. Berra Has No Cause of Action Here
For the same reason that Michael Jackson can't sue all the people who tell this joke:

"Why did Michael Jackson go to K-Mart? He heard all the boys' underwear was half off."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. If that joke were used in a Target advertisement, Jackson and K-mart might
be able to sue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. If It Was Used in an Advertisement For a SITCOM, Nobody Would
Edited on Wed Feb-02-05 11:48 AM by GiovanniC
be able to sue.

That's more the issue here.

Besides, they aren't even making fun of all the dumb things that guy has said... they're just making a play on his first name. Quite tame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. Good for Yogi---
Yogi Berra is a Yankee of the old school and a gentleman. I can see how any reference to him having sex with a woman other than Carmen would be deeply offensive to him.

Also, he is a viable commercial entity. Either you negotiate with him for his cut, or you don't get to use him.

Favorite Yogism?

Yogi: Where have you been?
Carmen (his wife): I took Tim to see Dr. Zhivago.
Yogi: What the hell's wrong with him now?

and,

"We were going to have some blinds repaired, only I didn't know it. I was upstairs, when my son Larry called out, "Dad the guy is here for the venetian blinds." I told him, "Look in my pants pocket and give him five bucks."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. They didnt use him, they made a joke about him.
So no, he doesnt have any case, and no it isnt classy for him to sue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. He actually does have a case. It's just not worth that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'm Going To (Again) Disagree
There is absolutely no basis for a lawsuit here. Zilch. For a number of reasons, not the least of which is that as a public figure, Yogi Berra has extremely limited recourse against SERIOUS defamation, and a lawsuit would have to show actual malice on the part of the Sex and the City ad campaign which I think we can all agree was not present.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I doubt it's a defamation that he'd win on. It's more like "false light"
or one of those torts where you can't impute someone's association with a product without their consent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. He Still Would Not Win
The sort of suit you're talking about would be like if they had billboards up with a picture of Yogi Berra that said "I watch Sex and the City every night except for the nights that I don't! - Yogi Berra" or otherwise claimed that Yogi Berra endorsed their show or "product". Again, that's not the case here.

How many times have you watched a show on TV where they mention a celebrity even though the celebrity didn't endorse the show? For example, a show like South Park, which featured a gigantic Mega-Barbara Streisand wreaking havoc on civilization, both on the show and in advertisements. Streisand could not then sue South Park or Comedy Central because of that.

I'm still waiting for any argument that you think would indicate that Berra would have any claim against TBS or Sex and the City. He's drawing dead right now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. You should read the complaint:
Edited on Wed Feb-02-05 08:23 PM by AP

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0131052yogi5.html

It looks like there's a statute covering this, and the difference between your hypothetical and this complaint is that the use of the name was in the context of an advertisement. This is why you don't see South Park putting Streisand's name on billboards advertizing South Park DVDs in New York State.

He's also suing for business loss.

This case has nothing to do with defamation.

The statutory claim is pretty straightforward. I think that's going to be worth something -- not much, but something. The second one I'm not so sure about it. I'm just guessing at what the elements would be, however, I suspect that the court will say that this wasn't really a business-like use of his name. Ie, it's doesn't really look like an endorsement. The statutory claim doesn't look like it has that sort of requirement. It's enough that the name was associated with the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. You are correct.
This being an ad makes it different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. a couple of yogi's
waiter: mr. berra, would you like us to cut your pizza into 6 slices or 8 slices?
yogi: better make it 6 slices ... i'm not hungry enough to eat 8 ...


reporter: yogi, could you comment on the 3 and 3 road trip you just completed?
yogi: i think this thing could have just as easily gone the other way ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. oh good grief....
Edited on Wed Feb-02-05 11:50 AM by shanti
at his age, he should be glad for this! LOL where's his sense of humor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC