Republican Congressman calls Feds "psycho"

[txaslftist]

Psycho Feds Target Children

by Rep. Ron Paul, MD

Every parent in America should be made aware of a presidential initiative called the “New Freedom Commission on Mental Health.” This commission issued a report last year calling for the mandatory mental health screening of American schoolchildren, meaning millions of kids will be forced to undergo psychiatric screening whether their parents consent or not. At issue is the fundamental right of parents to decide what medical treatment is appropriate for their children.

Forced mental health screening simply has no place in a free or decent society. The government does not own you or your kids, and it has no legitimate authority to interfere in your family’s intimate health matters. Psychiatric diagnoses are inherently subjective, and the drugs regularly prescribed produce serious side effects, especially in children’s developing brains. The bottom line is that mental health issues are a matter for parents, children, and their doctors, not government.

Unfortunately, however, the mental health screening initiative received funding from House and Senate appropriators in the 2005 federal budget. This funding allows states to create or expand mental health screening programs with your tax dollars. More importantly, the commission recommends a broader federal program in the near future.

Last fall I introduced an amendment to eliminate any funding for the proposal in a year-end spending bill. Although the amendment failed, the response to my office was overwhelming and highly supportive. The notion of federal bureaucrats ordering potentially millions of youngsters to take psychotropic drugs like Ritalin strikes an emotional chord with American parents, who are sick of relinquishing more and more parental control to government.

Accordingly, the first bill I introduced this year forbids federal funds from being used for any mental-health screening of students without the express, written, voluntary, informed consent of their parents. The bill is known as “The Parental Consent Act of 2005,” or HR 181. This legislation strikes a vital blow for parents who oppose government interference with their parental authority, and strengthens the fundamental right of parents to direct and control the upbringing and education of their children.

It is important to understand that powerful interests, namely federal bureaucrats and pharmaceutical lobbies, are behind the push for mental health screening in schools. There is no end to the bureaucratic appetite to run our lives, and the pharmaceutical industry is eager to sell psychotropic drugs to millions of new customers in American schools. Only tremendous public opposition will suffice to overcome the lobbying and bureaucratic power behind the president’s New Freedom Commission.

Your help is needed. Please tell everyone you know about HR 181, and ask them to call their representatives and senators in Washington to voice strong opposition to forced mental health screening. Demand that the Department of Health and Human Services receive no tax dollars in this year’s appropriation bill for screening programs, and that states receive no federal dollars for programs of their own. Refer to my congressional website for articles from September 2004 about mental health screening, and sobering statistics about anti-depressant drugs and kids in the text of HR 181. Most of all, talk with your friends, family, and colleagues about the underlying issue of whether the state owns your kids. Remind them that freedom can be maintained only when state power is limited, especially when it comes to fundamental freedoms over our bodies and minds.

February 1, 2005

Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.

[GiovanniC]

1. Hey, Even a Stopped Watch Is Right Twice a Day!

n/t

[Cats Against Frist]

2. Ron Paul is right more than twice a day

Here are just a few things that libertarians have in common with most Dems:

1. Anti-war
2. Anti-Corpo-fascist (though we believe in the free market, most libertarians are against using the military as a corporate arm, corporate bailout and subsidy, the human status of the corporation in the courts, CEOs writing our laws, secret energy commissions, etc.)
3. Instead of letting Bush plunder the Sequoias and the Alaskan Wildlife Refuge, Libertarians want to turn the land over to the Audubon Society and the Sierra Club.
4. While libertarians believe in decentralization, many are minarchists, who believe that the Constitution should be upheld -- and while they are also federalists, their core belief is that no one should have religion or "morals" forced upon them.
4. Libertarians disagree with Bush's stupid federal unfunded mandates.
5. Libertarians oppose the Patriot Act and erosion of civil liberties, including the above story about mandatory health testing.
6. Most libertarians believe in punative damages, meaning that although they don't use "prior regulation," if a corporation's product kills your kids or damages the water supply, you can attempt to recover damages from them.
7. True libertarians are suspicious of ALL big federal government, and that includes Bush's right-wing authoritarian statist government.

They may not be perfect. But libertarians, and particularly Ron Paul, are good allies on many issues.

[PROGRESSIVE1]

3. True. Ron Paul does not believe that corporations should tell the...

government and the people what to do. Also, he stood with us against the war.

[GiovanniC]

4. Referring to Republicans in General, Many of Whom Are Against This

Not Ron Paul in particular, though I agree with your sentiment that his libertarian beliefs lead him to being right more often than most "Republicans".

Never has an administration demanded as much government control and intrusion into the private lives of American citizens as this one has.