Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Martha Stewart?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 02:47 PM
Original message
Poll question: Martha Stewart?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CindyDale Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Victim of misogyny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. She beat the big boys at their own game one too many times.
Now the pushy broad is getting her comeuppance. (/sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I don't know If I buy that one
I think it is a class issue as much as anything--I mean she had a set of very upper middle class values that very few people can live up to but everybody was supposed to want to. So there was naturally some resentment.

I'm not saying misogyny didn't play some role in it, I just don't think it was the dominent reason she had her fall from grace.

Well she also might have broken the law--that probably played some role.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CindyDale Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. If you suck up to men you're OK
like Katherine Harris, Condolezza Rice, etc. If you make it on your own, they're out to get you.

Plus she's a Democrat, which means she supports other women and children making it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RNCPsychiatry Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Love her!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. picked other because
I can wait on the TV show. otherwise the section option is correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm an unapologetic fan
dammit.

But I know AP will be here soon to disparage her and I'm not going to take the bait! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sorry the Licenced Securities Trader
knew what she was doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CindyDale Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. What she did wasn't even illegal
from what I understand. All they convicted her of was stating that she was innocent. It's unprecedented, from what I heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Lying to Federal Officer
is what she was convicted of. But that was in association with Obstructing a Federal Investigation into insider trading and her complicity in insider trading. As a licenced broker, she knew the regulations about trading stocks based on information which has not been made public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Her mistake was talking to a federal officer
instead of allowing her lawyer to do it for her. They were investigating insider trading, but it has not been alleged in a criminal court that Ms. Stewart was complicit in it or that she had information that had not been made public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CindyDale Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. What she did wasn't illegal
She wasn't convicted of insider trading. I'm not an attorney, but here is another take on it:

http://www.mises.org/fullstory.aspx?control=1470

Lying to a federal officer is what they trap you into doing if they can't get you on anything else, I guess. They accused Tom Butler of that after they practically tortured him into saying things he later retracted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. And Capone was Tax Evasion
Yes and Capone wasn't taken down for racketeering either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. only Democrats and leftists are convicted of lying to feds
This is political any way you look at it. Classic technique of the McCarthy era and also the Cointelpro era -- if the person was innocent of any wrongdoing you could still get them on "lying to the feds" because any statement -- even saying you are innocent of wrong-doing -- can be construed as a "lie" if they're out to get you.

I think it's unprecedented to see this kind of action taken against a CEO, rather than, say, Howard Fast, but it wouldn't have happened if she were a GOP contributor instead of Democrat. And I doubt it would have happened if she'd been male.

The laws against lying to federal agents should be enforced against ALL, or they should be struck down. As it is, we have a situation where innocent people are jailed for saying they are not communists, for saying they are not criminals, for saying they are not whatever the hysteria of the day says they are.

Every day the DEA interviews drug distributors and not a one of them is jailed for "lying" to federal agents when they claim to be innocent.

Martha was railroaded to provide a Soviet style show trial.


The conservation movement is a breeding ground of communists
and other subversives. We intend to clean them out,
even if it means rounding up every birdwatcher in the country.
--John Mitchell, US Attorney General 1969-72


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Maybe
But I think all white collar criminals should be taken down. Regardless of who they contribute to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CindyDale Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. So you think we should just decide who looks like a criminal
and then prosecute them on whatever charge we can trump up?

I don't see it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. No, Just those that commit criminal acts.
Like Martha, Lay, Worldcom and Enron execs, to name just a few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CindyDale Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. You can't just decide someone you don't like is guilty
You have to have evidence, not just trumped up stuff.

Otherwise, it's not justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Did she trade her shares of IMClone
the afternoon before the announcement or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CindyDale Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. That was legal
They didn't convict her of that and you know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Maybe Legal, sort of
Edited on Thu Feb-03-05 04:34 PM by One_Life_To_Give
If Waksal didn't tell her why to sell it. Or give indication that "Any reasonable Securities Trader" would suspect was based on inside information.
Yes technically she was not convicted for that. But for lying during the investigation of Insider Trading at IMClone. Which if she is not guilty then it follows that is only because Waksal didn't tell her the whole story. And Waksal is guilty of insider trading. Which he happens to be serving seven years for.

edit sp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
codswallop Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. She had a seat on the NYSE, for cryin' out loud.
Edited on Thu Feb-03-05 04:41 PM by codswallop
The corruption stinks to high heaven. And still she whines.

Sam Waksal isn't doing hard time for nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. I voted the second option, but I do not "like" her.
I very much admire her. I respect her. She made it on her terms in a man's world. She took on the big boys and kicked their asses. Go Martha Go!

But she's not my favorite person in the world. I find I just don't like her when I watch her teevee show. But that's personal. On a broader level, she's quite a woman. One to be admired and emulated.

She was victimized. The sacrificial lamb to Ken Lay's fucking of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
codswallop Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. I used to like her a lot.
Don't no more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CindyDale Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Freeper alert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
21. Her new "Apprentice" show sounds like a winner
Perfect packaging...will certainly get
people who now watch Apprentice and
additionally those who will want to see
more "domestic" creative business challenges
assigned by a proven popular figure like
Trump is.

I think it'll be a real winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlchic Donating Member (272 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
23. Yeah, she was a scapegoat...
But I really don't care one way or the other. She obviously hasn't been suffering, and is now going to be better off because of it.

Her towels and sheets are okay, but I really don't have an interest in watching an elitist show me how to make a candy holiday wreath.

I remember the day she was sentenced, I saw a reporter doing a "on the steet interview" asking people what they would do if they knew they were going to prison in two weeks. My favorite answer:

"Well, I'm not rich and famous, so I don't think I would have been given two weeks to prepare for prison..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CindyDale Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Right, a woman succeeding despite persecution. What a nerve!
Kick her down fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop_the_War Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
25. Free Martha!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsAnthropy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
30. Her mac and cheese recipe has 22 ingredients! She's a public menace
and a danger to society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CindyDale Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Still that's not illegal
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. If I am not mistaken
wasn't shrub involved in inside trading several years ago? Nothing happened to him and he now has the title US President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC