|
I was reading about the situation in North Dakota where Democracy for America members/Progressive citizens were denied access to a Bush event. Where did such a list come from and who is creating such a list?
Is it the same list as the "no-fly" list?
Who is on the list(s)?
How is such a list legal, and what can be done about such privately accumulated black listing?
I found a post which is included below, referring to the Total Information Awareness program. I thought the program was disbanned a while back after it received so much negative attention and scrutiny. Apparently not.
Does anyone have information on the current status of the agency and its new name? There was also a Neighborhood watch program that was intiated in Florida which I haven't heard about in a while. It may have been started under the Total Information Awareness program as well. From the post:
<< The TIA (Total Information Awareness)(under a different name now) Central Database will become a powerful tool of the Compassionate Conservatives. This will be used to do so much more than just block you from attending a bush* event.
Wonder why you aren't getting promoted within the Corporation like your Republican co-workers?
Denied admission to a Graduate Program?
Denied that Pell Grant?
audited by IRS?
legitimate lawsuit thrown out of court?
zoning permit denied?
business license denied?
bank loan denied?
traveling blocked?
passport problems?
police harrassment?>>
Accumulating names and the creation of such a list is a clear violation of our Constitutional rights and Civil Liberties.
If someone and/or a group of someones we don't know, is tracking our daily activities which is privately being used against us, our rights along with laws are being violated and broken.
Situations like this show why we have the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendment.
For the record, here are such Amendments:
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
|