Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MORE SIGNS OF IMMINENT ATTACK? GENERAL ELECTRIC LEAVING IRAN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
poe Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:08 PM
Original message
MORE SIGNS OF IMMINENT ATTACK? GENERAL ELECTRIC LEAVING IRAN
First it was Halliburton, now General Electric. Companies are closing down business operations in Iran. “We’re seeing a turnaround by a number of U.S. companies operating in Iran,” Dan Katz, chief counsel to U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., told the Associated Press. Last year Lautenberg accused U.S. corporations of collecting “blood money” by doing business with “countries the United States says sponsors terrorism and said he would push for legislation to stop it.” Lautenberg said, “When American companies do business with Iran they are helping the Iranians create revenue that is funneled to terrorists.”

Suddenly, and remarkably, GE has grown a conscience.
General Electric is responsible for the murder of thousands, possibly millions of people, since it is “one of the world’s top three producers of jet engines, supplying Boeing, Lockheed Martin and other military aircraft makers for the powering of airplanes and helicopters,” explains CorpWatch. In fact, GE is one of the worst corporations in the world, guilty of various crimes, including: designing faulty nuclear power plants; conducting radiation experiments on humans; intentionally releasing large amounts of radiation into the air from the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in order to see the distance it would travel; poisoning its workers at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory in Schenectady, New York with radiation and asbestos; attempting to overturn the US Superfund Law of 1980.
Not surprisingly, GE has paid big bucks to pocket Congress critters on both sides of the aisle. “GE spent more than $31 million in 2001 and 2002 lobbying lawmakers; in 2000 it spent $16 million. Reigning CEO Jack Welch had enormous influence and was consistently ranked CEO of the Year by the slavish business press; he was major Republican donor as well. GE director Sam Nunn was senator for Georgia for 27 years, and also sits on the boards of ChevronTexaco. GE’s Senior Vice President and General Counsel and Secretary, Benjamin W. Heineman, used to work for the US government’s Department of Health, Education and Welfare. General Electric gave $221,350 to political campaigns in the 2002 election cycle, with 40 percent going to Democrats and 60 percent to Republicans.”

“Because of uncertain conditions related to Iran, including concerns about meeting future customer commitments, we will not accept any new orders for business in Iran effective Feb. 1,” said Gary Sheffer, a GE spokesman.
www.kurtnimmo.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NGU Donating Member (272 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is this country coming to?
Will it ever end?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. I remember when the media were drumming up support for the War
and MSNBC "advertised" a fighter jet made by GE. It was a disgusting display.

I have decided to get a lobotomy so that I remain in the dark as it's too depressing to have a brain. Hmmmm, either that or I could convert to Republicanism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Wouldn't it be a nice to be all rah-rah for a change?
To be able to look at the Resident without wanting to vomit?

To feel actual pride in your country's actions?

Sheesh. Pipe dreams!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Indeed it would.
How much does the Republican Party pay for one soul anyhow?

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. You almost made the lobotomy appealing
Don't go republicanism, no matter what. I had the same idea. It is too hard to fight fascism and I might as well knucle under. Then I thought again.
GE and Haliburton are moving out, that means the air campaign in not far behind and GE and Halibuton reaping huge profits. :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. War in Iran is imminent.
Have you seen the latest PNAC position paper calling for more troops? The word "draft" is not directly mentioned, but it is implied by the number of troops they are calling for. As the administration is in bed with the PNAC, its just a matter of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yep
and from what I'm hearing the military recruitment numbers are really low. Doy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Well, they aren't getting my son....
He's 17 years old.

Gee, I wonder what will happen when the draft is instituted. I wonder how many righties and fundies will be willing to send their sons and daughters? Will they still blindly support the war? My guess is no...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. The righties will be kindly excused
I'm sure they have much more important things to do, like running the empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poe Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Spring is near
Se rebeller est juste, désobéir est un devoir, agir est nécessaire !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
24. My kids are still young
but a LOT of my friends who support Bush have boys 18 to 25. Yep, I tell them, your vote for Bushie will get your son in camoflauge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
21. How imminent?
Within the next few months? A year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. Why do you always want to argue about when it will happen.
If you are so sure there will never be a draft, how can you explain the Chimpmonkey's obvious desire to force Syria and Iran into Democracies?

Will he just nuke them? That wouldn't take a draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. No lie there. When Halliburon and GE leave -- like rats --
you know its about to happen. I saw this earlier on another site and that was my thought.

Now that Dean will be the chair, I'm going to change my tags to the line in Revelation, which if this is the end of the age, you can only interpret as God's judgment coming down on the U.S. Truly, we are oppressors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Corporatism
Ike warned us about the military industrial complex, looks like it teamed up with wall street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. They just told you what is going to happen
"Because of uncertain conditions related to Iran" GE won't be accepting any new orders from Iran. And just what are those uncertain conditions? In so far as I know, nothing has changed in Iran......yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. The more we do to them
the less they believe we are doing it.

Attribution? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mockingbich Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks for this post
This is why I love DU - I'd never read this in the MSM or hear it on conservative radio

When you see the big money guys bailing...you know war is for real
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. Who will PNAC hit first?
The U$ to start a draft, or Iran to start the war?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RockStar Donating Member (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. Before we attack Iran PREPARE for the NEXT 911 on USA soil so we can blame
the iranians. I thinks its san francisco
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. fuck that
whta town do you live in? ok thats where i think its going down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RockStar Donating Member (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. It makes sense it would be san francisco
I love san francisco but hear me out. San Francisco is a major trade port. Also san francisco has alot of FOREIGN TOURIST. Think about if bush nuke san francisco and thousands of chinese killed,japanes etc. can you image the support he would get from those country..Its a sick plot but trust me those fuckers are crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
20. Hey Israel, there's your cue..........
we'll turn our heads for a few minutes so we don't actually see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
22. It's like the canary in the coal mine.
We're in big, big trouble and I don't know how we can get this mad man out of office before it happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaulaFarrell Donating Member (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
23. they're definitely preparing the way
New York, NY, Jan. 26 (UPI) -- The U.S. Air Force is playing a dangerous game of cat and mouse with Iran's ayatollahs, flying American combat aircraft into Iranian airspace in an attempt to lure Tehran into turning on air defense radars, thus allowing U.S. pilots to grid the system for use in future targeting data, administration officials said.

We have to know which targets to attack and how to attack them," said one, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The flights, which have been going on for weeks, are being launched from sites in Afghanistan and Iraq and are part of Bush administration attempts collect badly needed intelligence on Iran's possible nuclear weapons development sites, these sources said, speaking on condition of strict anonymity.

"These Iranian air defense positions are not just being observed, they're being 'templated,'" an administration official said, explaining that the flights are part of a U.S. effort to develop "an electronic order of battle for Iran" in case of actual conflict.

<snip>
He also made clear that that this entails "advance, detailed knowledge of the enemy's electronic order of battle and careful preplanning."




http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20050126-085709-3876r.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
25. War is great business for GE....They deal with both sides
Kind of like the Bush*'s. It is all about money & power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
26. We're not invading--we have Condi's word for it!
Edited on Fri Feb-04-05 10:10 AM by rocknation
From Comcast online:
LONDON - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said on Friday a U.S. attack on Iran "is simply not on the agenda at this point," despite the United States' continued criticism of Iran's human rights record and suspected nuclear weapons ambitions.

Would SHE lie to us? They couldn't have printed this if weren't true, so stop saying that!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. She would NEVER lie to us......
so stop impugning her integrity. <sarcasm>

Of course, 'at this point' can change in milliseconds. Maybe 'on the agenda - off the agenda' depending on who she's talking to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
27. WTF....
...is the US going to attack Iran with? Poorly trained conscripts? We sure as fuck don't have an army ready to take on another country, especially one that can actually fight back effectively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Obviously you're one of the poor uninformed...
who live in the "reality based community".

You should be reading scripture more, not listening the librul media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
28. We won't invade Iran...
We're prepping the way for "surgical air strikes" from our bases in Iraq and Afghanistan on Iran's "nukular facilities". When the Iranians respond to the airstrikes by lobbing shells into Iraq (how could they not do this and maintain face among the community of Middle-Eastern nations), we will respond in kind, then it will escalate into the ground war.

But we won't be invading, see. We'll be "defending the newly liberated nation of Iraq" from those evildoers in that wicked theocratic Empire who wish to destroy her self-determination and impose Islamic fascism.

You have to get used to the spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC