|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Peak_Oil (666 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 03:06 PM Original message |
Is it possible to set up a totally secure communications method |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scottxyz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. Your prayer has already been answered: WASTE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yella_dawg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. Define totally secure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
3. Steganography is the topic you're asking about. Try looking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salvorhardin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. There isn't anything like that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_DeLeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
5. an idea... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lectrobyte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
6. as far as unbreakable codes, there is a simple technology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ashmanonar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. one time pads or book codes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peak_Oil (666 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 04:35 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. That's it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ashmanonar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 04:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. yep, no problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 06:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Speaking of Steganography |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ashmanonar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 06:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. HA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-06-05 03:05 PM Response to Reply #10 |
23. E Clampus Vitus is the supersecret organization that can singlehandedly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WetBarNone (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 06:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. It may as well be rot13 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ashmanonar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 08:14 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. my cryptoskillz are the bomb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WetBarNone (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 08:53 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Boom, Like That |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ashmanonar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 09:31 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. lol. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-06-05 04:05 PM Response to Reply #8 |
24. there's only one problem with your theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jdots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
12. Yes and it's 100% undetectable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 06:53 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. It's not undetectable. Wired did an article a while back about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
13. Yeah. Buck naked in a field at midnight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WetBarNone (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
14. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cats Against Frist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
20. deeeeeee dooooooo deeeeee Papa November Papa November |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
21. Superencryption is the real deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-05 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
22. What you want will be vulnerable to "social engineering". nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC