Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sweet! New nuclear weapons for US!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Peak_Oil Donating Member (666 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 11:03 AM
Original message
Sweet! New nuclear weapons for US!
Lawmakers who hailed Congress' decision in November to squash funding for two controversial nuclear weapons programs may have to go to the mat once again after indications from the Bush administration that it will seek to revive the program in its 2006 fiscal year budget.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has been a proponent of new nuclear weapons research since early in his term. After Congress ignored the administration's prior request of nearly $37 million to continue studying several weapons — including the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (search), or "bunker-buster" bomb, and a low-yield bomb, or "mini-nuke" — officials began quietly looking for ways to restore them.

Earlier last week, the Washington Post reported on a memo Rumsfeld sent to then-Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham about two months ago.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,146535,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who needs the christian apocalypse when we can make our own.
Well, I guess the anti-ballistic missile system will protect us...

gulp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Clandestine project threatens nuclear non-proliferation
Sean Hobbs, Sydney

Looking at a map of the world, where would you expect to find a clandestine nuclear project? A project shrouded in secrecy that is attempting to make the process of enriching uranium cheaper, easier and more mobile? An attempt to develop technology that in 1981 the CIA reported could be used to “set up a garage-sized plant to produce weapon-grade uranium anywhere in the world”?

It’s happening in our backyard, in Sydney’s leafy southern suburbs. Silex Systems Ltd, in conjunction with the Australian government, is involved in a highly classified project to develop “separation of isotopes by laser excitation” (Silex) at Lucas Heights.

Silex, which is registered on the Australian Stock Exchange, is attempting to revolutionise the process of enriching uranium, using lasers in place of traditional centrifuge methods.

“If they actually get it to work then they are sitting on some knowledge that is potentially incredibly dangerous”, James Courtney, anti-nuclear campaigner for Greenpeace Australia, told Green Left Weekly on January 30.

Whereas no country has constructed traditional facilities for enriching uranium undetected, Courtney pointed out that lasers have the potential to do the job without emitting the “signatures” that lead to detection. These include waste gases, ultra-high frequencies from huge numbers of spinning centrifuges and the considerable size and power consumption of current plants.

It is feared that successfully developing the technology will pose significant new risks for the spread of nuclear weapons technology. The Stockholm International Peace and Research Institute stated as early as 1983: “There can be no doubt that continued progress in laser isotope separation will greatly complicate efforts to control nuclear weapon proliferation.” It is a sentiment that continues to echo distinctly across the landscape of contemporary global politics.
http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/2005/614/614p9.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. I feel safer already! Another 9/11 could NEVER happen now! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. I may need to change my screen name now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC