Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is "Defense Spending" considered an "Entitlement"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 07:14 PM
Original message
Is "Defense Spending" considered an "Entitlement"?
I just watched NBC News with Brian Williams.

On the report on the budget, Williams was slightly critical of bush*s statement that he will cut the deficit by 1/2.
He DID point out that the bush*/republican proposal doesn't include additional spending in Iraq and Afghanistan,
or the money that bush*s plan for privatizing Social Security would require.

But he closed his piece by stating that the "only way to decrease the deficit is to cut entitlements or increase revenue".

Shouldn't "Cutting Defense Spending" be included?

I realize that this cut is unlikely, but for the PUBLIC'S sake it should at least be in the dialog.

Is my outrage justified?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is tax relief for the wealthy considered an entitlement.
Is corporate welface an entitlement?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I agree.
Edited on Mon Feb-07-05 07:24 PM by bvar22
My outrage is over the fact that NBC is assisting the bush*/republicans in Framing the Debate for cutting social programs!

I'm not shocked by that, since ALL USMEDIA is Corporate Owned, but the outrage is continuous.

It is up to us to keep the debate honest. Defense Spending and Corporate Welfare MUST BE MENTIONED every time the budget is mentioned!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm with you.
Military spending has become bloated beyond belief. Time to start carving on it. The Pentagon's failure to attempt to get money back from Halliburton for services not rendered is a prime piece of evidence as far as I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Bloated Military Spending PIECHART (link/graph)

http://www.warresisters.org/piechart.htm



Total Federal Funds ( Outlays ): $ 1,926 Billion




Current Military, $536B:Military Personnel $109B, Operation and Maintenance $164B, Procurement $67B, Research and Development $66B, Construction $6B, Family Housing $4B, Retired Pay $44B, DoE Nuclear Weapons $17B, 50% NASA $8B, International Security $8B, 50%
Homeland Security $16B, Ex. Off. Pres. $10B, misc. $6B

Iraq & Afghan Wars, $50B: Though the cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars is not included in the President’s budget, it is included here because the Administration will request supplemental funding after the Nov. 2004 election.

Past Military, $349B: Veterans’ Benefits $69B; Interest on National Debt (80% estimated to be created by military spending) $280B

Human Resources, $633B: Education, Health/Human Services, HUD, Food/Nutrition programs, Labor Department, Soc. Sec. Admin.

General Government, $244B: Legislative, Justice Dept., State Dept., International Affairs, Treasury, Gov’t. Personnel, 20% interest on national debt, 50% of NASA, 25% Homeland Security

Physical Resources, $114B: Agriculture, Commerce, Energy, Interior Dept., Transportation, Environmental Protection, Army Corps Engineers, NSF, FCC, 25% Homeland Security



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sure it is. Who screams the loudest when a weapons system
is canceled or a base is closed? Not the Generals but the Congressmen from the districts in which they are manufactured or located.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Humongous defense spending is the military-industrial complex's
entitlement. Let the people eat cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC