We constantly hear about the "Terrorists" and how they are coming like barbarians to our gates. I would argue that the very term is devoid of much meaning. Many define it as "someone who attacks innocent civilians for political ends". By that definition terrorism is part of every war, on both sides.
Feel free to provide your own definitions!
=======================================================
Wrote up this little quiz on American history to illustrate my point:
Question 1: The American Revolution - We didn't kill much in the way of British civilians as they were mostly located in England. However, colonists loyal to the crown were attacked, killed, homes burned etc. These people were attacked by:
A)Terrorists
B)Brave Americans throwing off the shackles of British oppression
Question 2: The American Civil War - Sherman marches to the sea burning towns en route and killing many civilians. These rebels were attacked by:
A) Terrorists
B) Brave Union Soldiers trying to provide freedom for the slaves
Question 3 WWII - Nagasaki, Hiroshima are spared US bombing as they are secretly slated to be used as pristine proving grounds for a bomb meant to get Russia's attention. Over 200,000 civilians are killed by::
A) Terrorists
B) Brave Americans trying to prevent the loss of American lives.
Question 4: Vietnam - Numerous villages are burned, untold number of civilians killed by American soldiers trying to "save" them. These people were killed and their lives ruined by:
A) Terrorists
B) Brave Americans trying to prevent the spread of Godless communism through Southeast Asia
Question 5: Covert wars in Central America - Again rural villages attacked, and civilians (even priests and nuns) targeted by the CIA and their US funded death squads. These civilians were intentionally targeted by:
A) Terrorists
B) Brave Covert Americans trying to stem the spread of Godless communism in the Western Hemisphere
=================================================================
My point? ALL WARS throughout time have intentionally targeted civilians. The propaganda value of terms like the "war on terror" aside, I think that we could stand to get down off of our high horse a little.
When we raze a city like Falluja to drive out what the administration calls a small minority of the cities large population, do we cross that line?
Terms like "terrorist" that are thrown around are completely arbitrary and useful for propaganda purposes only. We need to realize that all sides in all wars fight with what they have. We must work to end the root causes of the violence rather than loosing the forest for the trees.
DA
http://www.seedsofdoubt.com/distressedamerican/main.htm